The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 359 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 6064 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 6070 |
Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership with a Specialization in Educational Technology
Phoniex University
Oct-1999 - Nov-2005
HR Executive
a21, Inc.
Nov-1998 - Dec-2005
Use the practice problem and a quantitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.
Â
In a 1000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.
Â
Refer to the resource "Research Critique Guidelines" for suggested headings and content for your paper.
Â
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Â
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Â
RUBRICS
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
|
Â
|
1
Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2
Less than Satisfactory 75.00% |
3
Satisfactory 83.00% |
4
Good 94.00% |
5
Excellent 100.00% |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.0 %Content
|
 | |||||
|
15.0 %Â Background of Study
|
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
|
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
|
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
|
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
|
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
|
|
|
15.0 %Â Method of Study
|
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
|
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
|
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
|
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
|
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
|
|
|
15.0 %Â Results of Study
|
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
|
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
|
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
|
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
|
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
|
|
|
15.0 %Â Ethical Considerations
|
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
|
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
|
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
|
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
|
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
|
|
|
15.0 %Â Conclusion
|
Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.
|
Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.
|
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.
|
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the findings importance to nursing practice.
|
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.
|
|
|
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
 | |||||
|
5.0 %Â Thesis Development and Purpose
|
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
|
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
|
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
|
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
|
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
|
|
5.0 %Â Argument Logic and Construction
|
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
|
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
|
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
|
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
|
Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
|
|
|
5.0 %Â Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
 | |||||
|
5.0 %Â Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
|
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
|
|
5.0 %Â Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
Sources are not documented.
|
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
|
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
|
|
|
100 %Â Total Weightage
|
 | |||||
Â
Â
Sol-----------uti-----------ons----------- fi-----------le ----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r y-----------our----------- in-----------ter-----------est----------- an-----------d b-----------uyi-----------ng -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I-----------