Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
Last Sign in: | 245 Weeks Ago |
Questions Answered: | 19234 |
Tutorials Posted: | 19224 |
MBA (IT), PHD
Kaplan University
Apr-2009 - Mar-2014
Professor
University of Santo Tomas
Aug-2006 - Present
Â
ÂProficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Introduction
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Identifies and describes the institution where the new program would be implemented, including institution name, location, focus, and other pertinent demographic identifiers
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Identifies and describes the institution where the new program would be implemented, but response is cursory, ambiguous, or lacking necessary detail
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not identify and describe the institution where the new program would be implemented
Needs Assessment: Potential
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Assesses the organizational design for potential program development
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Assesses the organizational design for potential program development, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not assess the organizational design for potential program development
Needs Assessment: Disparities
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Assesses community needs in terms of healthcare disparities
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Assesses community needs in terms of healthcare disparities, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not assess community needs in terms of healthcare disparities
Needs Assessment: Cultural Competence
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Assesses the organization’s healthcare programs in terms of the level of cultural competence they exhibit
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Assesses the organization’s healthcare programs in terms of the level of cultural competence they exhibit, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not assess the organization’s healthcare programs in terms of the level of cultural competence they exhibit
Needs Assessment: Strategy
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Recommends an appropriate and logical programmatic strategy, based on results of assessments
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Recommends a programmatic strategy, but strategy is inappropriate or illogical or is not based on results of assessments
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not recommend a programmatic strategy
Needs Assessment: Alignment
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Logically assesses programmatic strategy for alignment with ethical guidelines
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Assesses programmatic strategy for alignment with ethical guidelines, but assessment is cursory, vague, or illogical
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not assess programmatic strategy for alignment with ethical guidelines
Outcomes: Anticipated Outcomes
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Articulates the anticipated end result and explains how the program will produce results within the organization
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Articulates the anticipated end result and explains how the program will produce results within the organization, but response is cursory or vague
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not articulate the anticipated end result and does not explain how the program will produce results for the organization
Outcomes: Fit
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Describes how the program will fit into and interact with the rest of the organization
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Describes how the program will fit into and interact with the rest of the organization, but response is cursory, vague, or illogical
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not describe how the program will fit into and interact with the rest of the organization
Outcomes: Other Areas
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Assesses the impact, or lack thereof, of the program on other areas of the organization or the community, explaining why
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Assesses the impact, or lack thereof, of the program on other areas of the organization or the community, explaining why, but response or reasoning is cursory, vague, or illogical
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not assess the impact, or lack thereof, of the program on other areas of the organization or the community
Outcomes: Standards
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Assesses the impact of this program with respect to complying with cultural competence standards
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Assesses the impact of this program with respect to complying with cultural competence standards, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not assess the impact of this program with respect to complying with cultural competence standards
Articulation of Response (APA Style and Mechanics)
Points:
7.5 (10%)
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Points:
5.25 (7%)
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Points:
0 (0%)
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------.Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m ----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill-----------