CourseLover
$10/per page/Negotiable
Week 4 Discussion 1
Read more : http://www.ehow.com/how-does_5498041_kohlbergs-third-stage-moral-development.html?ref=Track2&utm_source=ask
|
Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development |
Required Text
Williams, C. R., & Arriago, B. A. (2012). Ethics, crime, and criminal justice (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Based on your readings for this week write a response in at least 250-300 words to the following prompt:
Chapter 7 introduces us to Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development. A provocative question is whether the system of law enforcement should, on any level, make distinctions between crimes motivated by more or less moral interests. For example, should we consider persons who violate the law for moral reasons less reprehensible and thus less legally blameworthy than others? Consider and answer the questions regarding the following hypothetical cases involving law-breaking behaviors. Which, if any, of these behaviors are immoral? Why? Based on Kohlberg’s model, at what level and stage of moral development would you place the person(s) in the following scenarios?
Now consider the following legal behaviors. Which, if any, would you consider to be immoral? Why? Given Kohlberg’s model of moral development, at what level and stage would you place the actor in question?
Decisions that children make at different stages of development, encouraging children to think about options, outcomes and effects of a decision; at different stages of development, actions are valued differently. In Kohlberg's third stage of moral development, dilemmas are presented and teens are encouraged to think in terms of good and bad motives that direct behavior. Introducing teens to dilemmas that involve tough decisions and multiple levels of reasoning will help them to think beyond simple obedience to rules of parents or
Kohlberg introduced the utilization of dilemmas to assist perceive the ethical choices that youngsters create at completely different stages of development, encouraging youngsters to deem choices, outcomes and effects of a decision; at completely different stages of development, actions ar valued otherwise.
please make sure all questions are answered thanks list references I usualy use two for this thanks
At the onset of his career, Jean Piaget was a biologist who studied molluscs. However, he soon became interested in the development of knowledge and thinking, and his interest drifted to human behavior and learning. He developed many theories about how infants and children learn about their environment, naming each stage as they progressed in their development. Piaget was also one of the first psychologists to specifically outline a theory of moral development. He began by studying the way children interact and play with one another, identifying the different rules they applied and their beliefs about what was right and wrong. Piaget also gathered information by interviewing children about acts like stealing and lying, noting the differences in children of different ages. His resulting theory identifies two distinct stages of moral development.
In the first stage of moral development, children follow strict rules and are completely obedient to authority. Piaget states that this occurs in younger children in part because of their cognitive development. For young children, rules are seen as inflexible things that do not change, which Piaget calls moral realism. Children in this stage are also judge how wrong a particular action is by its immediate consequences; negative consequences or punishment is seen as an automatic response to breaking a rule. Piaget also noted that social relationships between adults and children also supported this stage: adults have a natural authority over children of a young age, and power and rules are handed down without discussion.
As children begin to learn new things about the world through their interactions with other children and adults, they progress into the second stage of moral development. In this stage, Piaget states that children learn how to critically evaluate rules and apply them based on cooperation and respect with other children. Children begin to learn to take the perspective of others in this stage. Intention is also an important concept in this stage. Children begin to judge how wrong an action is by the intention of the perpetrator, and punishment is adjusted accordingly.
Based on his findings, Piaget suggested that schools focus on providing students with opportunities to develop and practice specific skills to aid in their moral development. He purported that children would learn best by situations that required cooperative decision making and problem solving with other children. Piaget believed that this method would be more effective that simply indoctrinating children with norms and rules.