Just watch the president Obama's 2015 State of the union and then write about 500 words and please write in high school level English, not college or university. Thank you

 

public presentations_observation_reports.docx 

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cse5cCGuHmE

 

First watch it and then do this assignment.

 

 

 

 

Public Presentations

Spring 2015
Observation Reports

Resources, Guidelines, Checklist, and RubricGuidelines

 

1.      The purpose of this observation report activity is for you to:

 

a.       be exposed to a variety of speakers in different situations (Critical Thinking SLO 2.1)

b.      see how different presenters deliver their messages (Language and Communication SLO 1.3)

c.       Compare and contrast deaf and hearing presenters in terms of the messages they convey and how they deliver those messages (Identity and Culture SLO 3.2, 3.3)

d.      develop your listening skills (Language and Communication SLO 1.3)

e.       learn to think more critically about presentation content (Critical Thinking SLO 2.3, 2.4)

f.       analyze presentation content and delivery (Knowledge and Inquiry SLO 4.1)

g.      demonstrate your ability to assess presentations as a whole (Knowledge and Inquiry SLO 4.1)

h.      demonstrate your ability to write presentation critiques (Language and Communication SLO 1.2; Critical Thinking SLO 2.4)

 

2.      Each observation report will consist of a form that you are to complete, and a 500-word analysis of content and delivery. The formis on the next page.In your write-up (one-inch margins top, bottom, left, and right; Times New Roman 12 point, double-spaced), you should have four sections: Introduction, Content, Delivery, and Analysis. In the Introduction, provide background: Who is presenting, what type of presentation it is, about what, when, where, etc. In the Content section, explain the presenter’s message(s). In the Delivery section, explain what the presenter did to get across that message. Finally, in the Analysis section, provide your perspective. Here are some questions to consider: How did the presenter do? Was he or she able to capture and hold your interest? Don’t limit yourself to these questions, though; I would like for you to provide your own analysis. A rubric follows the evaluation form.

 

3.       

Presentation Evaluation Form

 

Presenter __________________________________________________Deaf or Hearing? ____________________

 

Topic __________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Date ___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Live or Recorded/Archived? __________________________

 

Rate the speaker on each point:E-excellent       G-good       A-average       F-fair       P-poor N/A-Not applicable

INTRODUCTION Gained attention and interest Introduced topic clearly Established credibility Previewed body of presentation Related to audience	E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P
BODY Main points clear Main points fully supported Organization well planned Language accurate Language clear, concise Language appropriate Connectives effective	E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P
CONCLUSION Prepared audience for ending Reinforced central idea	E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P
DELIVERY Maintained eye contact Used ASL/voice effectively Used physical action effectively Presented visual aids well Used interpreter(s) appropriately	E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P   N/A E    G    A    F    PN/A
OVERALL EVALUATION Topic challenging Specific purpose well chosen Speech adapted to audience Speech completed within time limit	E    G    A    F    P  E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P E    G    A    F    P     N/A

 

 

 

 

 

Public Presentations

Spring 2015

Observation Reports Checklist

 

Checklist

 

For each observation report, you must submit by the due date (February 19, March 12, April 2, and April 23) the following:

 

1.      a completed Presentation Evaluation Form, ­

 

2.      a 500-word narrative (one-inch margins top, bottom, left, and right; Times New Roman 12 point, double-spaced), with four sections: Introduction, Content, Delivery, and Analysis.

 

 

 

 

“Goes without saying” requirements

 

1.      Your observation report must be submitted on time, electronically, and must comply with the requirements set out above.

 

2.      Your 500-word narrative must be well-written and free of grammatical and spelling errors.

 

 

 

 

Observation Reports Rubric

 

1. Your introduction contains all the requested, essential information.

 

Deficient	Emerging	Developing	Mastering	Exemplary
1	2	3	4	5
Missing all or most of the requested, essential information.	Missing much of the requested, essential information.	Missing much of the requested, essential information.	Contains most of the requested, essential information.	Contains all of the requested, essential information.

 

2. Your description of the presentation content is complete and accurate.

 

Deficient	Emerging	Developing	Mastering	Exemplary
1	2	3	4	5
Your description of the presentation content is incomplete and/or inaccurate, and is superficial.	Your description of the presentation content contains some detail, but not enough for the reader to visualize the situation.	Your description of the presentation content contains some detail, just enough for the reader to be able to visualize.	Your description of the presentation content is complete and accurate, and provides some detail.	Your description of the presentation content is complete and accurate, and provides a great deal of detail.

 

3. Your description of the presenter’s delivery is complete and accurate.

 

Deficient	Emerging	Developing	Mastering	Exemplary
1	2	3	4	5
Your description of the presenter’s delivery shows almost no attention to detail.	Your description of the presenter’s delivery shows little attention to detail.	Your description of the presenter’s delivery shows some attention to detail.	Your description of the presenter’s delivery is thorough and shows some attention to detail.	Your description of the presenter’s delivery is thorough and shows much attention to detail.

 

4. Your analysis shows considerable thought

 

Deficient	Emerging	Developing	Mastering	Exemplary
1	2	3	4	5
Your analysis suggests that you have given this presentation little or no thought, and that you have little or no understanding of how content and delivery together result in an effective presentation.	Your analysis suggests that you have not given this presentation adequate thought, and that you have at best a rudimentary understanding of how content and delivery together result in an effective presentation.	Your analysis shows that you have given this presentation thought, and that you have a developing understanding of how content and delivery together result in an effective presentation.	Your analysis shows that you have given this presentation some thought, and that you have a good understanding of how content and delivery together result in an effective presentation.	Your analysis shows that you have given this presentation much thought, and that you have an excellent understanding of how content and delivery together result in an effective presentation.