Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
Last Sign in: | 192 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago |
Questions Answered: | 27237 |
Tutorials Posted: | 27372 |
MCS,MBA(IT), Pursuing PHD
Devry University
Sep-2004 - Aug-2010
Assistant Financial Analyst
NatSteel Holdings Pte Ltd
Aug-2007 - Jul-2017
Assignment 1: Essay
Due Week 4 and worth 100 points
Choose one (1) of the topics below and develop a three to four (3-4) paragraph essay (of at least 250-500 words) which adequately address the topic you have chosen.
Topic Choices:
Write a 3-4 paragraph paper in which you:
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Points: |
Assignment 1: Essay |
||||
Criteria |
 Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
 Fair 70-79% C |
 Proficient 80-89% B |
 Exemplary 90-100% A |
1. Clearly state the “mystery†and provide a brief summary of at least two (2) reasonable and scholarly theories which could explain the mystery. Because some theories may sound far-fetched, include the source or promoter of each theory – such as a scientist, a historian, a theologian, etc. Weight: 40% |
Did not submit or incompletely stated the “mysteryâ€. Did not submit or incompletely provided a brief summary of at least two reasonable and scholarly (2) theories which could explain the mystery. Did not submit or incompletely included the source or promoter of each theory – such as a scientist, a historian, a theologian, etc. |
Insufficiently stated the “mystery†and provided a brief summary of at least two reasonable and scholarly (2) theories which could explain the mystery. Insufficiently included the source or promoter of each theory – such as a scientist, a historian, a theologian, etc. |
Partially stated the “mystery†and provided a brief summary of at least two reasonable and scholarly (2) theories which could explain the mystery. Partially included the source or promoter of each theory – such as a scientist, a historian, a theologian, etc. |
Satisfactorily stated the “mystery†and provided a brief summary of at least two reasonable and scholarly (2) theories which could explain the mystery. Satisfactorily included the source or promoter of each theory – such as a scientist, a historian, a theologian, etc. |
Thoroughly stated the “mystery†and provided a brief summary of at least two reasonable and scholarly (2) theories which could explain the mystery. Thoroughly included the source or promoter of each theory – such as a scientist, a historian, a theologian, etc. |
2. Identify one (1) of the theories as the most plausibleand provide at least two (2) convincing reasons why the theory you have chosen is the best one to explain the mystery. Weight: 35% |
Did not submit or incompletely identified one (1) of the theories as the most plausible and did not submit or incompletely provided at least two (2) convincing reasons why the theory you have chosen is the best one to explain the mystery. |
Insufficiently identified one (1) of the theories as the most plausible and insufficiently provided at least two (2) convincing reasons why the theory you have chosen is the best one to explain the mystery. |
Partially identified one (1) of the theories as the most plausible and partially provided at least two (2) convincing reasons why the theory you have chosen is the best one to explain the mystery. |
Satisfactorily identified one (1) of the theories as the most plausible and satisfactorily provided at least two (2) convincing reasons why the theory you have chosen is the best one to explain the mystery. |
Thoroughly identified one (1) of the theories as the most plausible and thoroughly provided at least two (2) convincing reasons why the theory you have chosen is the best one to explain the mystery. |
3.  2 references minimum (besides class text)– number and quality Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
4. Clarity, writing mechanics, referencing, and APA formatting requirements, including a reference list and matching in-text citations  Weight: 20% |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll