CourseLover

(12)

$10/per page/Negotiable

About CourseLover

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Algebra,Applied Sciences See all
Algebra,Applied Sciences,Architecture and Design,Art & Design,Biology,Business & Finance,Calculus,Chemistry,Engineering,Health & Medical,HR Management,Law,Marketing,Math,Physics,Psychology,Programming,Science Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 283 Weeks Ago
Questions Answered: 27237
Tutorials Posted: 27372

Education

  • MCS,MBA(IT), Pursuing PHD
    Devry University
    Sep-2004 - Aug-2010

Experience

  • Assistant Financial Analyst
    NatSteel Holdings Pte Ltd
    Aug-2007 - Jul-2017

Category > Art & Design Posted 11 Sep 2017 My Price 10.00

Need assistant with a review

Quantitative Article Review Grading Rubric

Student:

 

Summary

10

8

6

4

0

Total

Purpose of the study

Purpose of the study clearly and concisely identified.

Purpose of the study identified.

Purpose of the study is unclear.

No discussion of the purpose of the study.

Incomplete

 

Description of Participants/sample

Thorough description of participants/sample, including sample selection.

Good description of participants sample and sample selection procedures.

Moderately well description of participants sample and sample selection.

Little if any description of sample. No mention of sampling procedures.

Incomplete

 

Research Design

Research Design documented with indicators of why this is an appropriate design.

Research Design documented with a general recognition of why this is an appropriate design.

Research Design documented.

No research design indicated.

Incomplete

 

Data Collection& Analysis

Method of collection and statistical procedure(s) used to analyze data is  indicated and explained thoroughly.

Method of data collection and statistical procedure(s) indicated and somewhat explained.

Method of data collection and statistical procedure analyzed incorrectly

No method of data or statistical procedures  indicated.

Incomplete

 

Results

Tightly focused writing summarizing the results of the study

Generally focused summary of the results of the study

Somewhat focused summary of the results of the study

Scattered random writing without focus on the results of the study

Incomplete

 

Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

Further Research

Provides multiple directions for further research.

Provides a few directions for further research.

Directions for further research are unclear or inconsistent with findings.

Incomplete discussion of further research.

Incomplete

 

Validity/rival hypotheses

Complete yet concise discussion of the validity/rival hypotheses

Concise and generally recognizes most aspects of the validity/rival hypotheses

Validity/rival hypotheses tend to be one-sided with aspects of the validity/rival hypotheses missing.

Incomplete validity/rival hypotheses discussion

Incomplete

 

Original insight/Criticism

Insight/Criticism based on fact, research, or scholarly authority.

Generally good evidence given in support of opinion.

Evidence only somewhat supports opinion.

Opinion entirely unsupported.

Incomplete

 

Implications

Complete yet concise discussion of implications of research on practice

Concise and generally recognizes implications for practice.

Unclear implications for practice.

Incomplete discussion of implications. No connection between research and practice.

Incomplete

 

Writing/Style

 

 

 

 

 

 

Writing &APA

Free of spelling, syntax, and grammatical errors.  Well-edited material.APA style applied consistently throughout

Only a few errors of minor significance with grammar and APA

A number of errors.  Not well edited.

Many errors.  Poor grammar and sentence structure as well as APA errors

Incomplete

 

Total

/100

Instructor Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quantitative Article Review Instructions

Choose 1quantitative article from your Topical Reference List,and compose a 2-page review of it. Your review must include 2 sections: (1) a summary of the article and (2) a critical analysis of the article.

 

Your summarymust include:

  • The purpose of the study.
  • Description of participants/sample.
  • The research design (e.g., experimental, quasi-experimental, correlational, regression, etc.)
  • Method of data collection(survey, test, questionnaire, etc.).
  • Statistical analysis (t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), chi square, Pearson product moment correlation, Spearman rho, etc.).
  • Results.

 

Your analysismust include:

  • Opportunities for further research not already stated in the article.
  • Threats to validity or rival hypotheses not already discussed.
  • Other original insight or criticism
  • Implications of the findings.

 

See chapters 6–13 in your textbookif you need more help evaluating your article.

 

NOTE: If the article you selected does not identify how the data was statistically analyzed (e.g., t-test, ANOVA, ANCOVA etc.), it is likely that this article is either (a) not a quantitative study, or (b) not an actual research report, but just a summary of a study, in which case you should select another article.

 

 

Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 4.

 

Answers

(12)
Status NEW Posted 11 Sep 2017 04:09 PM My Price 10.00

----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll

Not Rated(0)