The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 283 Weeks Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 27237 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 27372 |
MCS,MBA(IT), Pursuing PHD
Devry University
Sep-2004 - Aug-2010
Assistant Financial Analyst
NatSteel Holdings Pte Ltd
Aug-2007 - Jul-2017
Quantitative Article Review Grading Rubric
Student:
Â
|
Summary |
10 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
Total |
|
Purpose of the study |
Purpose of the study clearly and concisely identified. |
Purpose of the study identified. |
Purpose of the study is unclear. |
No discussion of the purpose of the study. |
Incomplete |
 |
|
Description of Participants/sample |
Thorough description of participants/sample, including sample selection. |
Good description of participants sample and sample selection procedures. |
Moderately well description of participants sample and sample selection. |
Little if any description of sample. No mention of sampling procedures. |
Incomplete |
 |
|
Research Design |
Research Design documented with indicators of why this is an appropriate design. |
Research Design documented with a general recognition of why this is an appropriate design. |
Research Design documented. |
No research design indicated. |
Incomplete |
 |
|
Data Collection& Analysis |
Method of collection and statistical procedure(s) used to analyze data is indicated and explained thoroughly. |
Method of data collection and statistical procedure(s) indicated and somewhat explained. |
Method of data collection and statistical procedure analyzed incorrectly |
No method of data or statistical procedures  indicated. |
Incomplete |
 |
|
Results |
Tightly focused writing summarizing the results of the study |
Generally focused summary of the results of the study |
Somewhat focused summary of the results of the study |
Scattered random writing without focus on the results of the study |
Incomplete |
 |
|
Analysis |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Further Research |
Provides multiple directions for further research. |
Provides a few directions for further research. |
Directions for further research are unclear or inconsistent with findings. |
Incomplete discussion of further research. |
Incomplete |
 |
|
Validity/rival hypotheses |
Complete yet concise discussion of the validity/rival hypotheses |
Concise and generally recognizes most aspects of the validity/rival hypotheses |
Validity/rival hypotheses tend to be one-sided with aspects of the validity/rival hypotheses missing. |
Incomplete validity/rival hypotheses discussion |
Incomplete |
 |
|
Original insight/Criticism |
Insight/Criticism based on fact, research, or scholarly authority. |
Generally good evidence given in support of opinion. |
Evidence only somewhat supports opinion. |
Opinion entirely unsupported. |
Incomplete |
 |
|
Implications |
Complete yet concise discussion of implications of research on practice |
Concise and generally recognizes implications for practice. |
Unclear implications for practice. |
Incomplete discussion of implications. No connection between research and practice. |
Incomplete |
 |
|
Writing/Style |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Writing &APA |
Free of spelling, syntax, and grammatical errors. Well-edited material.APA style applied consistently throughout |
Only a few errors of minor significance with grammar and APA |
A number of errors. Not well edited. |
Many errors. Poor grammar and sentence structure as well as APA errors |
Incomplete |
 |
|
Total |
/100 |
|||||
|
Instructor Comments: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â |
||||||
Â
Quantitative Article Review Instructions
Choose 1quantitative article from your Topical Reference List,and compose a 2-page review of it. Your review must include 2 sections: (1) a summary of the article and (2) a critical analysis of the article.
Â
Your summarymust include:
Â
Your analysismust include:
Â
See chapters 6–13 in your textbookif you need more help evaluating your article.
Â
NOTE: If the article you selected does not identify how the data was statistically analyzed (e.g., t-test, ANOVA, ANCOVA etc.), it is likely that this article is either (a) not a quantitative study, or (b) not an actual research report, but just a summary of a study, in which case you should select another article.
Â
Â
Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 4.
Â
----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll