1.) You are a management consultant for a 30-year-old partner in a large law firm. In a meeting, your client says: “According to an article inThe New York Times, 57 percent of large law firms have a mandatory retirement age for partners in the firm. Before they retire, partners are paid directly for the work that they do, and, as an owner, they are entitled to a share of the profits of the firm. Once they retire, partners do not receive either form of compensation. In light of this, I think we should eliminate mandatory retirement in order to gain a ‘competitive advantage’ in attracting high-quality lawyers to work for our firm. Of course, you are the expert.”

• a.) Is mandatory retirement legal in your chosen profession or career path? If so, what is the justification for the law? Does your current employer have a mandatory retirement age?
• b.) Should the law firm eliminate mandatory retirement in order to gain a ‘competitive advantage’? Describe and justify your recommendation.
• c.) Discuss your own personal and professional opinion about mandatory retirement, regardless as to the industry.

AccountingQueen

(3)

Status NEW Posted 19 Sep 2017 04:09 PM My Price 8.00

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l

Not Rated(0)

• Buy Answer