The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 352 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 20103 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 20155 |
MBA, PHD
Phoniex
Jul-2007 - Jun-2012
Corportae Manager
ChevronTexaco Corporation
Feb-2009 - Nov-2016
The Supreme Court of Illinois is considering a case involving only Illinois parties and events that took place in illinois. In this case, that court is convinced that a federal regulation requires something (call it Y) that a provision of the illinois constitution prohibits.
Â
1. The court would prohibit Y because of the Supremacy Clause.
2. The court would require Y because of the Supremacy Clause
3. The court would prohibit Y because all parties are from Illinois and all events occur in Illinois, no other state jurisdictions are implicated.
4. The court would prohibit Y because, if a regulatory provision cannot be reconciled with a constitutional provision, then the constitutional provision trumps the regulatory provision
5.None of the above
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l