The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 352 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 20103 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 20155 |
MBA, PHD
Phoniex
Jul-2007 - Jun-2012
Corportae Manager
ChevronTexaco Corporation
Feb-2009 - Nov-2016
Hearsay exceptions.
Prosecution of Defendant for kidnapping. Defendant denies involvement. During their
investigation, the police questioned Zed. At first, Zed denied having any knowledge
of the crime. After being warned that his lack of cooperation might lead to his being
charged as a principal in the crime, Zed admitted involvement, but claimed his only
role was to develop information about the victim’s daily routine and to pass it along
to Defendant, who Zed claimed actually captured and held the victim. Zed also told
the police how and where Defendant captured the victim. Zed was killed in an auto
accident before trial. The prosecution offers Zed’s statements into evidence.
Defendant objects on hearsay grounds. How should the court rule?
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l