The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 352 Weeks Ago, 6 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 20103 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 20155 |
MBA, PHD
Phoniex
Jul-2007 - Jun-2012
Corportae Manager
ChevronTexaco Corporation
Feb-2009 - Nov-2016
Fed.R.Evidence 804 exceptions to the rule against hearsay-when the declarant is unavailable as a witness.
1.Negligence action arising from an automobile collision. Plaintiff claims Defendant’s
car crossed the center line and struck Plaintiff’s car. To prove that it was Plaintiff’s
car that crossed the center line, Defendant calls Zed, a passenger in Plaintiff’s car,
and asks Zed if it isn’t true that, after the accident, Zed admitted to a police officer
that she grabbed Plaintiff’s steering wheel as a joke and that the car veered left,
crossing the center line. Plaintiff objects on hearsay grounds. How should the court
rule?
2.Same case. Suppose Zed refuses to answer the question even though the court orders
her to do so. Defendant now calls the police officer to whom Zed made the
statement, and asks that person to relate what Zed said. Plaintiff objects on hearsay
grounds. How should the court rule?
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l