QuickHelper

(10)

$20/per page/

About QuickHelper

Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Accounting,Applied Sciences See all
Accounting,Applied Sciences,Business & Finance,Chemistry,Engineering,Health & Medical Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 352 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 20103
Tutorials Posted: 20155

Education

  • MBA, PHD
    Phoniex
    Jul-2007 - Jun-2012

Experience

  • Corportae Manager
    ChevronTexaco Corporation
    Feb-2009 - Nov-2016

Category > Law Posted 21 Sep 2017 My Price 5.00

Hi, Currently, I am studying duty of care in Torts and I am having trouble grasping my head around the current approach of the HCA.

Hi, 

Currently, I am studying duty of care in Torts and I am having trouble grasping my head around the current approach of the HCA. What I think is that in order to prove a duty of care exists is that the Plaintiff will be required to prove the harm they experienced as a result of the defendant was reasonably foreseeable AND they should also prove some salient factors in accordance with Sullivan v Moody. Can you please advise if there are any gaps in my knowledge. 

 

Thanks :) 

Answers

QuickHelper
(10)
Status NEW Posted 21 Sep 2017 03:09 PM My Price 5.00

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l

Not Rated(0)