QuickHelper

(10)

$20/per page/

About QuickHelper

Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Accounting,Applied Sciences See all
Accounting,Applied Sciences,Business & Finance,Chemistry,Engineering,Health & Medical Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 352 Weeks Ago, 6 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 20103
Tutorials Posted: 20155

Education

  • MBA, PHD
    Phoniex
    Jul-2007 - Jun-2012

Experience

  • Corportae Manager
    ChevronTexaco Corporation
    Feb-2009 - Nov-2016

Category > Law Posted 23 Sep 2017 My Price 5.00

Compare and contrast the strengths

Compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of the Durkheimian and Weberian theories of legal change. Think about and include answers for the following the following issues: How adequate are their descriptions of the legal systems they analyze? What variables do theyuse to account for the emergence of modern legal systems? What evidence did they use tosupport or refute their arguments? Conclude your essay with a concise discussion that tellswhich theorist offers the better explanation of legal change. Justify your choice.

Answers

QuickHelper
(10)
Status NEW Posted 23 Sep 2017 06:09 AM My Price 5.00

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l

Not Rated(0)