Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University,PHD
Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
Last Sign in: | 262 Weeks Ago, 1 Day Ago |
Questions Answered: | 20103 |
Tutorials Posted: | 20155 |
MBA, PHD
Phoniex
Jul-2007 - Jun-2012
Corportae Manager
ChevronTexaco Corporation
Feb-2009 - Nov-2016
Answer the following questions:
1. What is the affidavit asking the judge to authorize (specifically)?
2. What was good about this affidavit? What, if anything, could have been done to strengthen this affidavit?
3. If you are the forensic examiner in this case, and this warrant was given to you with Mr. Didit's seized desktop and removable media, what do you have the authority to search? For what do you have the authority to search?
4. Are the answers to question 1 and question 3 above the same? Explain why or why not.
5. Provide an example of an action the investigator could take in his examination of Mr. Didit's media that would be outside the scope of search authorized by this warrant.
6. If the investigator acted outside the scope of this warrant, as you described, what could be the result? What is the "fruit of the poisonous tree," and how does it relate to this scenario?
7. What is the purpose of the "Officer's Return" associated with this warrant?
Â
Â
Attachments:Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l