AccountingQueen

(3)

$16/per page/Negotiable

About AccountingQueen

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Accounting,Algebra See all
Accounting,Algebra,Applied Sciences,Architecture and Design,Art & Design,Biology,Business & Finance,Calculus,Chemistry,Communications,Computer Science,Economics,Engineering,English,Environmental science,Essay writing,Film,Foreign Languages,Geography,Geology,Geometry,Health & Medical,History,HR Management,Information Systems,Law,Literature,Management,Marketing,Math,Numerical analysis,Philosophy,Physics,Precalculus,Political Science,Psychology,Programming,Science,Social Science,Statistics Hide all
Teaching Since: Jul 2017
Last Sign in: 362 Weeks Ago, 3 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 5502
Tutorials Posted: 5501

Education

  • MBA.Graduate Psychology,PHD in HRM
    Strayer,Phoniex,
    Feb-1999 - Mar-2006

  • MBA.Graduate Psychology,PHD in HRM
    Strayer,Phoniex,University of California
    Feb-1999 - Mar-2006

Experience

  • PR Manager
    LSGH LLC
    Apr-2003 - Apr-2007

Category > Business & Finance Posted 25 Sep 2017 My Price 5.00

product liability cases

1. On what product liability theory or theories would the plaintiffs in the Vioxx cases have been relying? Under tort law: negligence, recklessness and strict liability and also under contract law: express or implied warranties.

 

2. What legal elements must the plaintiffs prove in order to win the Vioxx cases?

Negligence elements, physical injury, and the breach of duty

3. Are punitive damages routinely awarded, in addition to compensatory damages, in product liability cases? What would the plaintiff in the Ernst case have had to prove in order for punitive damages to have been assessed against Merck?

Punitive damages are not always awarded on top of compensatory damages in product liability cases. In some states, in order for punitive damages to be awarded in a product liability case, the plaintiff would have had to prove that the business displayed some conscious disregard for the safety of the product’s users and by-standers. In those states, a showing of negligence or even strict liability would be sufficient to support punitive damages.

 

If a manufacturer's product works well for most users but the manufacturer is aware that some users may experience harm as a result of using it, what would utilitarian’s and rights theorists say concerning whether the manufacturer has an ethical obligation to warn about the risk of harm or to suspend sales of the product? (You may wish to consult the discussion of ethical theories in Chapter 4 as you answer this question

Answers

(3)
Status NEW Posted 25 Sep 2017 02:09 PM My Price 5.00

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l

Not Rated(0)