ORIGINAL WORK ONLY 200 words each question.
ORIGINAL WORK ONLY
200 words each question. 1 reference each question
Â
Question1 -Â Pre- and Post-Offer Testing
Under what circumstances is it legal, advisable, or ethical to engage in the following practices?
- -Require pre-offer medical examinations of some applicants and not others
- -Require post-offer, preemployment medical examinations of some applicants and not others
- -Retain information generated by medical and preemployment testing in each applicant's general personnel file
Provide an example for each.
Â
Question 2 -Â Physical Examinations After Employment
What about physical examinations after employment, to make sure that a person remains physically qualified to do the job? Â What does an employer have to show to be allowed to subject an employee to such an exam? Â
Consider the case of Epter v. New York City Transit Authority, 127 F.Supp. 384 (E.D.N.Y. 2001), http://www.leagle.com/decision/2001511127FSupp2d384_1472/EPTER%20v.%20NEW%20YORK%20CITY%20TRANSIT%20AUTHORITY,Â
where the court held that there was no significant proof that there was a danger to the public if station masters over 40 had a heart attack on the job.
What sort of jobs might be able to justify such a physical exam as a BFOQ?
Answers
Status NEW
Posted 28 Sep 2017 10:09 AM
My Price 8.00
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l
Not Rated(0)