The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 352 Weeks Ago, 4 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 20103 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 20155 |
MBA, PHD
Phoniex
Jul-2007 - Jun-2012
Corportae Manager
ChevronTexaco Corporation
Feb-2009 - Nov-2016
UNIT 7- COMPLETE<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Complete analysis on the case study andrespond by Sunday by 11:59 pm CT. A minimum of 1200 words is required. Answerboth questions in the case study and write 600 words or more for each question.Please make sure you use proper academic resources and proper APA standards foreach answer. A minimum of two outside sources are required.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
1.     In Case 3-1, whichspecific employee right protected by Section 7 of the LMRA could Drake andKeeler argue they were engaged in which at least partially motivated theemployer's decision to discharge them?
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
2.     On what grounds mightthe employer try to argue that the discharge of Drake and Keeler was anappropriate (legal) exercise of management's rights?
Â
Â
Â
Â
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l