The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 362 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 20103 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 20155 |
MBA, PHD
Phoniex
Jul-2007 - Jun-2012
Corportae Manager
ChevronTexaco Corporation
Feb-2009 - Nov-2016
Plaintiff, a German wine producer and exporter in Rotterdam, Germany contracted to ship 620 cases of wine to the defendant, a distributor in Wilmington, North Carolina. The contract did not specify the shipment as destination.
Defendant called repeatedly to find out the status of the shipment and was not given a shipping date.
Later, without notifying the defendant, the plaintiff delivered the wine to a shipping line in Rotterdam, destined for Wilmington, N.C. The ship and the wine were lost at sea en route to Wilmington. When the defendant refused to pay on the contract, the plaintiff sued.  Â
Using the UCC rules, which party wins?        Why?     Â
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l