Greetings profmelisah hope you are well- I need your assistance with an assignment that I am hoping you'll be able to tackle. It is a PHI 103 Informal Loigic course. (This subject is not found to attach) The assignment is a final paper that is to discuss premises, conclusions,etc. due the hindrance of social media. The running head topic that I have chosen to discuss is Does social media enhance or hinder interpersonal relationships? and my end conclusion to be addressed is "hinders interpersonal relationships. I have attached some files for you. Please can you let me know if you will be able to assist me- thank you.

 

Write: in your paper

• Explain the topic you are addressing and your position on it. Provide a preview of your paper and a statement of your thesis in your opening paragraph. [Approximately 100 words]For help crafting a good thesis statement, go to the Ashford Writing Center.
• Present your main argument for your thesis in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line. Clearly indicate whether your argument is intended to be inductive or deductive. Follow up the presentation of your argument by clarifying the meaning of any premises that could use some explanation. [About 150 words]If your argument is deductive, then it should be valid (in the strict logical sense of the word); if it is inductive, then it should be strong. Make sure to avoid committing logical fallacies within your argument (e.g., begging the question). Additionally, the premises should be true, to the best of your knowledge. If one of your premises has a pretty obvious counter-example, then you should either fix the argument so that it does not have this flaw, or later, in your paper (steps three through five) you should address the apparent counter-example (showing that it does not really refute the truth of your premise). Arguments that are not valid, not very strong, commit fallacies, or that have counter-examples that are not adequately addressed will not receive full credit.
• Provide supporting evidence for the premises of your argument. [Approximately 350 words]Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments (arguments whose conclusions are premises of the main argument), or other ways of demonstrating the truth of those premises. This section should include at least one scholarly research source.
• Explain a strong objection to your argument. [Approximately 250 words]Study what people on the other side of this question think about your reasoning and present the best possible objection that someone could have to your argument. Do not commit the straw man fallacy here. Reference at least one scholarlyresearch source. See the âPracticing Effective Criticismâ section of Chapter 9 of the course text for more information.
• Defend your argument against the objection. [Approximately 200 words]Once you have presented the objection, indicate clearly how you might respond to it. It is acceptable to admit that reasonable people might disagree with you or that there might be an area in which your argument could be further strengthened, but you should do your best to explain why your argument is sound or cogent despite the objections.
• Provide an appropriate conclusion. [Approximately 75 words]

Attachments:

• 1507300561-PHI 103 wk 1 assignment.pdf
• 1507300563-PHI 103 wk 3 assignment.pdf