The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 352 Weeks Ago, 4 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 20103 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 20155 |
MBA, PHD
Phoniex
Jul-2007 - Jun-2012
Corportae Manager
ChevronTexaco Corporation
Feb-2009 - Nov-2016
1. Why doesn't the additional hardship associated with the flooding fit within the preexisting duty exception?
2. What facts would have to change in order for the additional work to be considered "unforeseen"?
Â
Instructions:
Attached is the Case Study
Read Case 15.2 and answer questions 1 & 2.
Simple is good, answer the questions without much "fat" on them. One or two sentences answers work fine, just do the length you need to answer the questions.
(English speakers only)
Â
Â
I will pay a good tip when I received the requested answer!

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l