Over  50 years ago, Stanley Milgram conducted some of the most influential and  controversial research on the Social psychological concept of obedience. Milgram  found that over 65% of the subjects in his study willingly delivered highly  dangerous shock levels to another person, simple because they were told to do  so by someone in authority. The lessons most people drew from his research was  that ordinary people could be convinced to commit acts of cruelty simply  because they were told to do it by a person in a position of authority.  However, recently psychologists have suggested that the behavior of Milgram’s  research participants may not have been due to their blindly obeying an  authority figure. Discuss at least two other explanations that critics give for the behavior of subjects in Milgram’s study, other than that they were blindly following the orders of someone in authority (2 pts)

Describe 3 of the 4 primary ways that the conditions of the Milgram’s studies differed from that of real-life mass-killing in wartime. (6 pts)

CourseLover

(12)

Status NEW Posted 09 Oct 2017 06:10 AM My Price 10.00

----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll

Not Rated(0)

• Buy Answer