The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 57 Weeks Ago, 2 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 7570 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 7352 |
BS,MBA, PHD
Adelphi University/Devry
Apr-2000 - Mar-2005
HOD ,Professor
Adelphi University
Sep-2007 - Apr-2017
BUS 380 Week 6 Assignment 3Â Work Breakdown Schedules, Uncertainty, and Dependency Relationships.
Â
|
Write a develop a three to five (3–5) page paper that addresses the following: ·        Describe the elements of the project plan that depend on the WBS, and provide examples of any four (4). ·        Discuss the potential risks and circumstances under which it might be appropriate to use a WBS from a previous project rather than develop a new one. ·        Explain why it is useful to have a complete WBS before engaging in formal uncertainty assessment. ·        Explain the difference between hard logic and soft logic for establishing dependency relationships in project schedules and offer a creative example (not from the text) for each one.  The format of the paper is to be as follows: ·        Typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides, APA format. ·        Use headers for each of the subjects being covered, followed by your response. ·        In addition to the three to five (3–5) pages required, a title page is to be included. The title page is to contain the title of the assignment, your name, the instructor’s name, the course title, and the date. Note: You will be graded on the quality of your answers, the logic/organization of the report, your language skills, and your writing skills. |
The assignment will be graded using the following rubric:
|
Outcomes Assessed |
·        Analyze the process of creating and using the work breakdown structure. ·        Assess and prepare for project uncertainties. ·        Analyze the steps involved in project scheduling. ·        Use technology and information resources to research issues in managing project teams. |
|
Grading Rubric for Assignment 1 — Work Breakdown Schedules, Uncertainty, and Dependency Relationships’ |
|
Â
|
Criteria |
0 |
20 |
30 |
40 |
|
1. Describe the elements of the project plan that depend on the WBS, and provide examples of any four (4). |
Did not complete the assignment or did not describe the elements of the project plan that depend on the WBS, and provide examples of any four (4); omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. Completed with less than 60% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Partially described the elements of the project plan that depend on the WBS, and provided examples of any four (4); omitted some key information. Completed with 60-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Sufficiently described the elements of the project plan that depend on the WBS, and provided examples of any four (4). Completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Fully described the elements of the project plan that depend on the WBS, and provided examples of any four (4). Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
|
2. Discuss the potential risks and circumstances under which it might be appropriate to use a WBS from a previous project rather than develop a new one. |
Did not complete the assignment or did not discuss the potential risks and circumstances under which it might be appropriate to use a WBS from a previous project rather than develop a new one; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. Completed with less than 60% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Partially discussed the potential risks and circumstances under which it might be appropriate to use a WBS from a previous project rather than develop a new one; omitted some key information. Completed with 60-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Sufficiently discussed the potential risks and circumstances under which it might be appropriate to use a WBS from a previous project rather than develop a new one. Completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Fully discussed the potential risks and circumstances under which it might be appropriate to use a WBS from a previous project rather than develop a new one. Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
|
3. Explain why it is useful to have a complete WBS before engaging in formal uncertainty assessment. |
Did not complete the assignment or did not explain why it is useful to have a complete WBS before engaging in formal uncertainty assessment; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. Completed with less than 60% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Partially explained why it is useful to have a complete WBS before engaging in formal uncertainty assessment; omitted some key information. Completed with 60-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Sufficiently explained why it is useful to have a complete WBS before engaging in formal uncertainty assessment. Completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Fully explained why it is useful to have a complete WBS before engaging in formal uncertainty assessment. Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
|
4. Explain the difference between hard logic and soft logic for establishing dependency relationships in project schedules and offer a creative example (not from the text) for each one. |
Did not complete the assignment or did not explain the difference between hard logic and soft logic for establishing dependency relationships in project schedules and offer a creative example (not from the text) for each one; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. Completed with less than 60% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Partially explained the difference between hard logic and soft logic for establishing dependency relationships in project schedules and offered a creative example (not from the text) for each one; omitted some key information. Completed with 60-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Sufficiently explained the difference between hard logic and soft logic for establishing dependency relationships in project schedules and offered a creative example (not from the text) for each one. Completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Fully explained the difference between hard logic and soft logic for establishing dependency relationships in project schedules and offered a creative example (not from the text) for each one. Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
|
5. Clarity. |
Did not complete the assignment or explanations are unclear and not organized. |
Explanations generally unclear and not well organized. |
Explanations generally clear and/or organized. (Minor issues) |
Explanations very clear and well organized. |
|
6. Writing – Grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, APA usage. |
Did not complete the assignment or had 8 or more different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Major issues) |
Had 6–7 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Many issues) |
Had 4–5 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Minor issues) |
Had 0–3 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. |
Â
Â
BUS----------- 38-----------0 W-----------eek----------- 6 -----------Ass-----------ign-----------men-----------t 3-----------Â W-----------ork----------- Br-----------eak-----------dow-----------n S-----------che-----------dul-----------es,----------- Un-----------cer-----------tai-----------nty-----------, a-----------nd -----------Dep-----------end-----------enc-----------y R-----------ela-----------tio-----------nsh-----------ips-----------. -----------Â -----------