CourseLover

(12)

$10/per page/Negotiable

About CourseLover

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Algebra,Applied Sciences See all
Algebra,Applied Sciences,Architecture and Design,Art & Design,Biology,Business & Finance,Calculus,Chemistry,Engineering,Health & Medical,HR Management,Law,Marketing,Math,Physics,Psychology,Programming,Science Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 283 Weeks Ago, 1 Day Ago
Questions Answered: 27237
Tutorials Posted: 27372

Education

  • MCS,MBA(IT), Pursuing PHD
    Devry University
    Sep-2004 - Aug-2010

Experience

  • Assistant Financial Analyst
    NatSteel Holdings Pte Ltd
    Aug-2007 - Jul-2017

Category > Psychology Posted 13 Oct 2017 My Price 10.00

The subject is dealing with Political Science

Please read the file and answer the questions with right answers. I have attached the readings that will help also. Please do the best job possible. Thanks. There is only 15 questions. The subject is dealing with Political Science

 

European Journal of International Relations 2016, Vol. 22(3) 512 –535 © The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1354066115600038 ejt.sagepub.com E J R I Human rights pragmatism: Belief, inquiry, and action Geoff Dancy Tulane University, USA Abstract Human rights scholars and activists have often been criticized for being “principled” rather than “pragmatic” actors in international politics. Rarely, though, is such criticism accompanied by a discussion of what pragmatism means, or what pragmatic action looks like. This article conceptually traces and defines three aspects of pragmatism — philosophical, methodological, and political — that might be applied to the global human rights discourse. The article then outlines how these aspects can help resolve debates over human rights beliefs, scientific inquiry, and political action. I argue, first, that critics of human rights do not adequately develop the concept of human rights pragmatism, and then I make the case using examples that human rights discourse already lends itself toward a pragmatic train of thought. The implication of this analysis is that the “pragmatist” critique of human rights actors is, at minimum, unfounded and, at maximum, a mask for more pessimistic anti-rights positions. Keywords Human rights, international law, pessimism, pragmatism Introduction A centerpiece of the international post-war order, human rights law, is under critical attack for making little difference in today’s world. Eric Posner’s (2014) The Twilight of Human Rights Law , Stephen Hopgood’s (2013) The Endtimes of Human Rights , and Emilie Hafner-Burton’s (2013) Making Human Rights a Reality , as well as various chapters in an upcoming volume entitled Human Rights Futures edited by Hopgood, Jack Snyder, and Leslie Vinjamuri (forthcoming), all argue that a gap is widening Corresponding author: Geoff Dancy, Assistant Professor, Tulane University, 6823 St. Charles Ave., 316 Norman Mayer Bldg, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA. Email: gdancy@tulane.edu 600038 EJT 0 10.1 7 /135406 1 560 038European Journal of International Relations Dancy research-article 2015 Article

 

Background image of page 01

Attachments:

Answers

(12)
Status NEW Posted 13 Oct 2017 12:10 PM My Price 10.00

----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------You----------- fo-----------r u-----------sin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll

Not Rated(0)