QuickHelper

(10)

$20/per page/

About QuickHelper

Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Accounting,Applied Sciences See all
Accounting,Applied Sciences,Business & Finance,Chemistry,Engineering,Health & Medical Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 362 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 20103
Tutorials Posted: 20155

Education

  • MBA, PHD
    Phoniex
    Jul-2007 - Jun-2012

Experience

  • Corportae Manager
    ChevronTexaco Corporation
    Feb-2009 - Nov-2016

Category > Management Posted 16 Oct 2017 My Price 10.00

Project 2 (Week 6)

Project 2 (Week 6)

This project requires you to identify and analyze legal issues and to make recommendations based on one or more fact patterns. The issues will relate to the concepts covered in weeks 4 and 5 about contract law.

Contractors, Inc. contracted with College to build a 20-room, 2 story classroom building, constructed of gray bricks, and according to architectural specifications provided by College.   The building is to be located on campus at the corner of Campus Way and Academic Avenue at a contract cost of $5,000,000, and to be completed by August 1, 2015.   This August 1 deadline would give College just enough time to move into the building and prepare the inside for classes to begin August 14.  College informed Contractors that time was of the essence and that this is a tight timeline for moving into the new building.

The valid, written contract read, in part, as follows.

CONTRACT

We, the undersigned, party of the first part, hereinafter College, and party of the second part, hereinafter Contractors, Inc.  hereby agree to the following:

1)  Contractors, Inc. will build a 20-room, 2-story classroom building constructed of gray bricks, at the corner of Campus Way and Academic Avenue, in accordance with the architectural specifications stipulated by College and attached hereto and in compliance with Maryland building codes and regulations for new construction;

2)  Contractors, Inc. will complete the construction project at a total cost of $5,000,000, inclusive;

3)  Contractors, Inc. will complete the construction project not later than August 1, 2013.  Time is of the essence.

 

College will pay Contractors, Inc. for the completed project, the sum of $5,000,000 not later than August 7, 2015.

Signed:

 

Robert Jones

Robert Jones

President, College

Date:  January 10, 2015

 

Signed:

John Doe

John Doe

President, Contractors, Inc.

Date:   January 10, 2015

 

  1. On May 28, 2015, after the construction was more than half completed, the cost of bricks used for construction of the building increased substantially in the marketplace so that Contractors could no longer construct the building for $5,000,000.  Contractors told College that it would need an additional $250,000 to complete the building using gray bricks on the exterior.  College agreed to modify the original contract to increase the construction costs by $250,000, bringing the total cost of the project to $5,250,000.   

College and Contractors drew up the following contract modification as an addendum to the original contract:

CONTRACT ADDENDUM

We, the undersigned, party of the first part, hereinafter College, and party of the second part, hereinafter Contractors, Inc. hereby agree to the following modification to the original agreement:

1)  In addition to the contractual agreed upon cost of $5,000,000, College will pay Contractors, Inc. an additional $250,000 to build a 20-room,  2-story classroom building constructed of gray bricks, at the corner of Campus Way and Academic Avenue;

2)  College will pay Contractors, Inc. for the completed project, the sum of $5,250,000 not later than August 7, 2015;

3)  This modification does not in any way change any other terms of the original contract (attached hereto).

 

Signed:

Robert Jones

Robert Jones

President, College

Date:  June 1, 2015

 

Signed:

John Doe

John Doe

President, Contractors, Inc.

Date:    June 1, 2015

 

After the contract modification, Contractors continued to work on the building but did not meet the August 1 completion deadline.  The building was completed on August 21, 2015.

In the meantime, fall semester classes began at College on August 14, making it necessary for College to lease classroom space from August 14-September 4, 2015.  College necessarily had to hold classes in the leased space for 3 weeks until September 4 because it took 2 weeks (from August 21) for College to move into the new building and prepare it for classes.  The lease costs were $5,000 per week, for a total of $15,000 for 3 weeks.

College paid Contractors $5,000,000 on September 4, but refused to pay the additional $250,000.  College filed suit against Contractors for breach of contract.

Contractors countersued College for breach of contract.

 

Please label each part of paper as listed below.

Part I: Discuss the basis of a breach of contract claim by College against Contractors, any potential damages College could claim and the likely outcome of a lawsuit.

5-6 paragraphs minimum with in text cites; in depth, comprehensive; outside resources not necessary as all classroom resources will be sufficient.

Part II:  Discuss the basis of a breach of contract claim of Contractors against College, any potential damages Contractors could claim and the likely outcome of a lawsuit.

5-6 paragraphs minimum with in text cites; in depth, comprehensive; outside resources not necessary as all classroom resources will be sufficient.

BE CAREFUL!  This is not meant to be tricky but it is a very detailed analysis requiring in depth analysis and close scrutiny of every detailed fact.  No information other than what is provided here is needed for this project.

 

Due Date  
Jul 24, 2016 11:59 PM

Hide Rubrics

Rubric Name: Written Assignment (20%)

7 points

demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; provides thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions

5.95 points

shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions

5.25 points

shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion

4.55 points

shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions

3.85 points

lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims

7 points

arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts

5.95 points

arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts

5.25 points

arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material

4.55 points

arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material

3.85 points

arguments lack meaningful explanation or support of ideas

3 points

demonstrated full understanding of requirements; responded to each aspect of assignment

2.55 points

demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment

2.25 points

demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment

1.95 points

failed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment

1.65 points

did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements

2 points

writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability

1.7 points

most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues

1.5 points

wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar

1.3 points

unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues

1.1 points

largely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure

1 point

no APA style errors

0.85 points

attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present

0.75 points

attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document

0.65 points

attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other

0.55 points

no attempt at APA style

         

Answers

(10)
Status NEW Posted 16 Oct 2017 04:10 PM My Price 10.00

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l

Not Rated(0)