Miss Natalia

(14)

$20/per page/Negotiable

About Miss Natalia

Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University

Expertise:
Accounting,Business & Finance See all
Accounting,Business & Finance,Calculus,Computer Science,Environmental science,Health & Medical Hide all
Teaching Since: Apr 2017
Last Sign in: 360 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 6064
Tutorials Posted: 6070

Education

  • Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership with a Specialization in Educational Technology
    Phoniex University
    Oct-1999 - Nov-2005

Experience

  • HR Executive
    a21, Inc.
    Nov-1998 - Dec-2005

Category > Business & Finance Posted 17 May 2017 My Price 10.00

Explain why a court will not grant a request for specific performance in the event of a breach of a personal service contract.

Directions:

a.         Answer of the following 8 questions (10 points each).

b.         Include your name on this page and save the file.

c.         Upload the completed file to the Blackboard Assignment section no later than 10:00 PM May 20, 2017

 

1.    Sam and Robin are adults. Sam tells Robin, “Let's gamble - I’ll flip this coin. If it’s heads I’ll buy your I-Pad for $1000. If it’s tails, you’ll sell it to me for $100.” Robin agrees and Sam flips the coin which comes up heads. Explain whether this agreement is a valid contract, a voidable contract, or a void agreement and why. Would your answer be different if Robin and Sam were minors? Explain.

 

2.    Explain the difference between a unilateral mistake and a bilateral (mutual) mistake by the parties to a contract and the effect that each type of mistake has on the enforceability of the agreement. Give an example of each type of mistake as part of your answer. Be sure your examples are not ones that are used in your textbook.

           

3.    Explain the difference between an intended beneficiary and an incidental beneficiary of a contract and explain the rights of each to sue to enforce the contract in the event of a breach of contract by one of the parties in privity. Discuss the meaning of “privity” and give an example of an intended and an incidental beneficiary as part of your answer. Be sure your examples are not ones that are used in your textbook.

 

4.    Explain why the non-breaching party is required to make a good faith effort to mitigate the damages resulting from a breach of contract by the other party. Give an example of an appropriate mitigation of damages. Be sure your example is not one that is used in your textbook.

 

5.    Explain the Statute of Frauds’ requirement for a contract in writing and how this has been modified to facility electronic commerce. Including a discussion of how the E-Sign Act and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) apply.

 

6.    Explain why a court will not grant a request for specific performance in the event of a breach of a personal service contract. Give an example of a personal service contract as part of your answer. Be sure your example is not one that is used in your textbook.

 

7.     Bob and Tom orally agree that Tom will restore Bob's 1957 Ford for $20,000.  No time frame is                    agreed upon.  Over a year later, Tom finally tells Bob that he is done, but demands $60,000 because   it took more effort than he originally anticipated.  Bob realizes that he no longer has the original            $20,000, and finds out the car was worthless to begin with, so simply claims there is no enforceable contract because he never signed anything.  Will the statute of frauds apply here? Why or why not?

 

8.    Skyler is selling items at a garage sale.  Walt walks up and immediately recognizes what he believes  to be an authentic Picasso worth $50,000.  Walt tries to play it cool and proclaims “Well, I suppose I  could put that crummy piece of art in my bathroom, although I'm sure it's worth nothing!”  Skyler  does not say anything to Walt, but knows the Picasso to be a fake only worth $50.  After some back and forth negotiating, she sells it to Walt for $500.  Walt immediately calls Saul and tries to sell him the artwork.  Saul examines the artwork and proclaims it to be a fake, but as they remove the panting from it's binding, they find $50,000 hidden behind it.  Skyler gets wind of this and is livid, and sues Walt for return of the painting and the $50,000.  Will she win?  Why or why not?



Remember to answer only 4 of these 8 questions. If you answer more than four, only the first four will be graded.

 

Answers

(14)
Status NEW Posted 17 May 2017 04:05 AM My Price 10.00

Sol-----------uti-----------ons----------- fi-----------le ----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r y-----------our----------- in-----------ter-----------est----------- an-----------d b-----------uyi-----------ng -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I-----------

Not Rated(0)