Consider the following examples of research findings:
Could you please assist me on this. Thanks in advance
PSY 520 Short Paper 2 Guidelines and Rubric Consider the following examples of research findings: 1. High satisfaction with one’s direct supervisor leads to lower levels of employee turnover. In other words, employees who are highly satisfied with their direct supervisor are less likely to leave an organization than employees who are dissatisfied with their direct supervisor (DeConinck, 2009). 2. High levels of parental reading are associated with faster cognitive development in young children. In other words, children who are read to more by their parents show faster cognitive development than children who are read to less often (National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, 2007). 3. The experience of being socially excluded leads to increases in aggressive behavior. Research has found that when people are excluded by others, they are more likely to behave aggressively, even to people who did not initially exclude them (Twenge, Baumeister, Tice, & Stucke, 2001). 4. Defendants who wear glasses are less likely to be convicted by juries as being guilty of committing violent crimes (Brown, Henriquez, & Groscup, 2008). In a brief paper (2–3 pages), describe a potential mediator and moderator that could apply to each research finding. Be sure to clearly explain what a mediator and moderator are, and be sure to clearly describe how they relate to each research situation. Guidelines for Submission: Submit a 2–3-page document with double spacing, 12-point font, and one-inch margins, with any sources referenced cited in APA format. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions . Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value Explanation of Mediators Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation is succinct and needs no clarification Clearly and accurately describes mediators Understanding is evident, though some confusion or lack of clarity is also evident No explanation, or it is evident that the writer does not understand mediators 20 Explanation of Moderators Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation is succinct and needs no clarification Clearly and accurately describes moderators Understanding is evident, though some confusion or lack of clarity is also evident No explanation, or it is evident that writer does not understand moderators 20 Application of Mediators to Research Situations Accurately identifies all potential mediators and correctly explains why they are applicable Accurately identifies three of four potential mediators and correctly explains why they are applicable Accurately identifies two of four potential mediators and correctly explains why they are applicable, and/or two of four explanations are insufficient and/or incorrect Fewer than two mediators are identified correctly. Explanations are incorrect and/or insufficient 20
Answers
Status NEW
Posted 22 Oct 2017 07:10 AM
My Price 10.00
----------- ----------- H-----------ell-----------o S-----------ir/-----------Mad-----------am ----------- Th-----------ank----------- yo-----------u f-----------or -----------usi-----------ng -----------our----------- we-----------bsi-----------te -----------and----------- ac-----------qui-----------sit-----------ion----------- of----------- my----------- po-----------ste-----------d s-----------olu-----------tio-----------ns.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age-----------
Not Rated(0)