Dr Nick


$14/per page/Negotiable

About Dr Nick

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Art & Design,Computer Science See all
Art & Design,Computer Science,Engineering,Information Systems,Programming Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 48 Weeks Ago, 1 Day Ago
Questions Answered: 19234
Tutorials Posted: 19235


  • MBA (IT), PHD
    Kaplan University
    Apr-2009 - Mar-2014


  • Professor
    University of Santo Tomas
    Aug-2006 - Present

Category > Geometry Posted 30 Oct 2017 My Price 11.00

4 Le- Essay


Donna Driver gets into a car accident with Vic Victim in Cleveland, Ohio. Vic sustains severe injuries. Donna admits liability as she knows that she ran a red light by mistake, thus causing the accident. Donna has auto insurance with an insurance company called Gekko. Her policy has a liability coverage limit of $100,000. Unfortunately, Vic's medical bills alone run close to $100,000 and between that and his missed work and pain and suffering, he appears to have a strong case to recover significantly more than that.;However, Vic is in no mood for litigation. He therefore offers to settle the whole case for $100,000. Donna pleads with Gekko to settle the case for the $100,000, as she knows that at trial, she will probably get hit with a verdict for more than that. However, Gekko refuses, saying that it will not settle for more than $50,000. If that amount won't be accepted, it will take its chances at trial.;The case goes to trial and Vic eventually wins a verdict of $200,000. $100,000 is paid by Gekko and Donna is forced into bankruptcy because she cannot pay off the remaining $100,000. Donna sues Gekko in Ohio civil court, claiming that under Ohio law, the insurance company had a duty to negotiate in good faith. Donna claims that it was obvious that Vic's case was worth more than $100,000 and that Gekko's intransigence caused her now to face bankruptcy. She therefore asks that Gekko be forced to pay the full $200,000 to Vic so that she does not have to.;Please read the following cases;Shaeffer, Whiting v. Grange Mutual Casualty Company, 1981 Ohio App. LEXIS 14351 (Ohio Ct. App. 1981);Schneider v. Eady, 2008-Ohio-6747 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008);Please discuss, in about one page for each case, how each of those two cases is likely to affect our case.;This is NOT an IRAC-based essay assignment.


Status NEW Posted 30 Oct 2017 11:10 AM My Price 11.00

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r v-----------isi-----------tin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion----------- pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l

Not Rated(0)