Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
Last Sign in: | 246 Weeks Ago, 4 Days Ago |
Questions Answered: | 19234 |
Tutorials Posted: | 19224 |
MBA (IT), PHD
Kaplan University
Apr-2009 - Mar-2014
Professor
University of Santo Tomas
Aug-2006 - Present
Jim Turin & Sons, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 219 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2000).Analyze the cash method and the accrual method described in the case above. How did Jim Turin & Sons, Inc. assert its position? What were the key points in the decision that determined revenue recognition?
Review the following case: Jim Turin & Sons, Inc., Petitioner-Appellee, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellant. Analyze the cash method and the accrual method described in the case above.How did JimTurin& Sons, Inc. assert its position?What were the key points in the decision that determined revenue recognition?
Specifically,the following critical elementsmust be addressed:
ï‚· Analyzes the cash method described in the case
ï‚· Analyzes the accrual methods described in the case
ï‚· Assesses how Jim Turin & Sonsinc. asserted its position in the case
ï‚· Summarizes the key points in the decision that determined revenue recognitionÂ
APA FORMAT
Number of Pages: 02
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam-----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r v-----------isi-----------tin-----------g o-----------ur -----------web-----------sit-----------e a-----------nd -----------acq-----------uis-----------iti-----------on -----------of -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion----------- pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l