CourseLover

(12)

$10/per page/Negotiable

About CourseLover

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Algebra,Applied Sciences See all
Algebra,Applied Sciences,Architecture and Design,Art & Design,Biology,Business & Finance,Calculus,Chemistry,Engineering,Health & Medical,HR Management,Law,Marketing,Math,Physics,Psychology,Programming,Science Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 283 Weeks Ago, 2 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 27237
Tutorials Posted: 27372

Education

  • MCS,MBA(IT), Pursuing PHD
    Devry University
    Sep-2004 - Aug-2010

Experience

  • Assistant Financial Analyst
    NatSteel Holdings Pte Ltd
    Aug-2007 - Jul-2017

Category > Psychology Posted 04 Nov 2017 My Price 10.00

Law and Psychology - Week 3 - University Alliance

Law and Psychology - Week 3 - University Alliance

Critical Reading – The USS Iowa: Equivocating on Death

Critical reading assignments evaluate how well you can summarize key concepts in academic papers. You are going to be graded on your ability to put the answers to each question INTO YOUR OWN WORDS. I am not interested in how well you can hunt out answers and copy them into a Word document – I need to know that you understand the material. Rarely (if ever) should you quote directly from the reading, and copying without proper paraphrasing is considered plagiarism and will result in a zero on the assignment and possibly an "F" in the course.

Read

Ewing, C., and McCann, J. (2006). Minds on trial: Great cases in law and psychology. NY: Oxford University. pp. 129-139.

Read the chapter provided and answer the following questions 

  1. 1. Give a brief summary of the timeline of events in this case (2 points)
  2. 2. What is a psychological autopsy (equivocal death analysis)? Why was one ordered for the USS Iowa? (2 points)
  3. 3. Who performed the psychological autopsy for the Navy? (1 point)
  4. 4. What sort of evidence did the investigators use to support their belief that Hartwig caused the accident? (3 points)
  5. 5. What was the final assessment of Hartwig by the FBI agents? (3 points)
  6. 6. What four issues did the panel of experts, called by the House Armed Services Subcommittee, review? (2 points)
  7. 7. List some conclusions from the panel. How did they differ from the FBI agents’ conclusions? (3 points)
  8. 8. What do YOU think happened? Support your theory. (4 points)

Attachments:

Answers

CourseLover
(12)
Status NEW Posted 04 Nov 2017 02:11 PM My Price 10.00

-----------  ----------- H-----------ell-----------o S-----------ir/-----------Mad-----------am ----------- Th-----------ank----------- yo-----------u f-----------or -----------usi-----------ng -----------our----------- we-----------bsi-----------te -----------and----------- ac-----------qui-----------sit-----------ion----------- of----------- my----------- po-----------ste-----------d s-----------olu-----------tio-----------ns.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age-----------

Not Rated(0)