CourseLover

(12)

$10/per page/Negotiable

About CourseLover

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Algebra,Applied Sciences See all
Algebra,Applied Sciences,Architecture and Design,Art & Design,Biology,Business & Finance,Calculus,Chemistry,Engineering,Health & Medical,HR Management,Law,Marketing,Math,Physics,Psychology,Programming,Science Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 283 Weeks Ago, 2 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 27237
Tutorials Posted: 27372

Education

  • MCS,MBA(IT), Pursuing PHD
    Devry University
    Sep-2004 - Aug-2010

Experience

  • Assistant Financial Analyst
    NatSteel Holdings Pte Ltd
    Aug-2007 - Jul-2017

Category > Psychology Posted 15 Nov 2017 My Price 10.00

Good and Evil

Why are some people "evil" whereas others are not?


Good and Evil Why are some people “evil” whereas others are not? Have you ever wondered why it is that some people are evil or do evil things, when there are also a lot of people who do nothing close to that bad? How can it be that some people go through life without getting involved in any sort of negative or bad things, when other people seem to make decisions that are viewed as evil? The Assignment: This assignment gets you to look at and evaluate how to answer this question using two prominent perspectives from Psychology that have been referenced throughout the course: biological, cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, evolutionary, and humanistic. Your job is to: 1) select 2 perspectives from the preceding list 2) from the article source list provided below, list at least four sources, two from each perspective). They can be sources within the articles. Summarize each of the sources. Document your sources in APA style. You should be sure that your in-text citations and reference page are done in APA style. 3) write a paper (APA style, 2-3 pages, double-spaced, 1” margins, 12 pt font) integrating both perspectives, presenting a way of answering the question, and selecting which perspective you agree with more and why. Some things to keep in mind: you will need to thoroughly explain how someone working within each of the perspectives you chose views the issue and how, according to the perspectives, an answer to the question would be sought. Also, think about the following questions as you write your paper: do you agree with one or the other perspective? Why? Be sure to support your perspective with evidence you have collected from your sources. Lastly, include the conclusions that can be drawn from the two perspectives and the implications that those conclusions have for psychologists and society at large . Steps: 1. Explain how each perspective would view the issue 2. Using each perspective, explain how the question could be answered. 3. Do you agree (or disagree) with one (or both) perspective’s approach to this issue. 4. Provide citations to support your choice/opinion(s). 5. Draw the conclusions that would result for each perspective. 6. If the conclusions are true, how do they affect psychologists and/or society? Schemata of steps: 1. Explain 2. Perspective 1 Perspective 2 3. Agree Disagree Agree Disagree 4. Support Support 5. Conclusions Conclusions 6. Implications Implications
Background image of page 1

Attachments:

Answers

(12)
Status NEW Posted 15 Nov 2017 07:11 AM My Price 10.00

-----------  ----------- H-----------ell-----------o S-----------ir/-----------Mad-----------am ----------- Th-----------ank----------- yo-----------u f-----------or -----------usi-----------ng -----------our----------- we-----------bsi-----------te -----------and----------- ac-----------qui-----------sit-----------ion----------- of----------- my----------- po-----------ste-----------d s-----------olu-----------tio-----------ns.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age-----------

Not Rated(0)