This week we will dialog from a scholarly perspective about what motivates terrorists.  While Crenshaw argues that terrorism is a rational choice made to achieve the goals of the group, Post argues that terrorists are driven by psychological forces that attract people to violence. Post's argument has caused controversy because some people believe that it seeks to absolve terrorists from the responsibility of their acts. For this discussion, chose a side and present your rationale for believing its ideas have merit. It doesn't matter which side you choose here, but you must choose ONE and defend it using course readings as support for your stance. No fence straddling; you must choose a side to earn points.  Don't forget to include your references. Need a minimum of 300 words

CourseLover

(12)

Status NEW Posted 18 Nov 2017 11:11 AM My Price 10.00

-----------  ----------- H-----------ell-----------o S-----------ir/-----------Mad-----------am ----------- Th-----------ank----------- yo-----------u f-----------or -----------usi-----------ng -----------our----------- we-----------bsi-----------te -----------and----------- ac-----------qui-----------sit-----------ion----------- of----------- my----------- po-----------ste-----------d s-----------olu-----------tio-----------ns.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age-----------

Not Rated(0)

• Buy Answer