CourseLover

(12)

$10/per page/Negotiable

About CourseLover

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Algebra,Applied Sciences See all
Algebra,Applied Sciences,Architecture and Design,Art & Design,Biology,Business & Finance,Calculus,Chemistry,Engineering,Health & Medical,HR Management,Law,Marketing,Math,Physics,Psychology,Programming,Science Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 283 Weeks Ago, 2 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 27237
Tutorials Posted: 27372

Education

  • MCS,MBA(IT), Pursuing PHD
    Devry University
    Sep-2004 - Aug-2010

Experience

  • Assistant Financial Analyst
    NatSteel Holdings Pte Ltd
    Aug-2007 - Jul-2017

Category > Psychology Posted 22 Nov 2017 My Price 10.00

reviewing the literature

 

this is the closest course i could get, but i am actually in the MPH program at UNE.  

1. You have an idea for a study, but after reviewing the literature you realize that the intervention you had in mind has already been tested for people with the disease you planned to focus on. The only difference is that you would be conducting the study within a different population. You should conclude that your study idea is not original. T/F 2. The specifc aim statement, "To assess whether more expercise is better For overweight children" is. ..? a. too precise. B. too vague c. just right. 3.  Studies that randomize participants into intervention or control groups can still meet the "distributive  justice" principle even though not all the participants receive the intervention.    T/F 4. Researchers are conducting an analysis using a de-identifed dataset that was created at a hospital For quality reporting purposes. There is a good chance that the IRB would consider this study "exempt" on the grounds that: It would likely not meet the "benefcence" principle. The inFormed consent process would not be Feasible. The research involves analysis oF an existing dataset. All research that does not involve blatant human rights abuses is considered. 5.  The 4 components of the "PICO" framework are most useful for developing questions for quantitative  studies. For qualitative studies you might only be addressing the "P" and "O" components.  T/F 6.  IF you have a scale that always reads your weight as 20 pounds more than it really is, you could say that: The scale is valid, but not reliable The scale is reliable, but not valid The scale is neither reliable nor valid It is time to go on a diet 7. A study on a new depression treatment recruited patients who scored in the highest depression range ("severely depressed") on the PHQ9 depression screen questionnaire. These patients were assigned to either a treatment or a comparison group. At the end oF the
Background image of page 1

Attachments:

Answers

CourseLover
(12)
Status NEW Posted 22 Nov 2017 12:11 PM My Price 10.00

-----------  ----------- H-----------ell-----------o S-----------ir/-----------Mad-----------am ----------- Th-----------ank----------- yo-----------u f-----------or -----------usi-----------ng -----------our----------- we-----------bsi-----------te -----------and----------- ac-----------qui-----------sit-----------ion----------- of----------- my----------- po-----------ste-----------d s-----------olu-----------tio-----------ns.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age-----------

Not Rated(0)