CourseLover

(12)

$10/per page/Negotiable

About CourseLover

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Algebra,Applied Sciences See all
Algebra,Applied Sciences,Architecture and Design,Art & Design,Biology,Business & Finance,Calculus,Chemistry,Engineering,Health & Medical,HR Management,Law,Marketing,Math,Physics,Psychology,Programming,Science Hide all
Teaching Since: May 2017
Last Sign in: 283 Weeks Ago, 1 Day Ago
Questions Answered: 27237
Tutorials Posted: 27372

Education

  • MCS,MBA(IT), Pursuing PHD
    Devry University
    Sep-2004 - Aug-2010

Experience

  • Assistant Financial Analyst
    NatSteel Holdings Pte Ltd
    Aug-2007 - Jul-2017

Category > Psychology Posted 28 Nov 2017 My Price 10.00

issue of access to firearms

I Need help with the following questions? class hum/111 university of phoenix


1)In your response, I wanted to focus a bit on your point about the issue of access to firearms. I am sure we can agree that there are some legitimate uses for guns. I believe what the discussion has centered around are the facts that some abuse the use and cause issues for others. Guns have never actually killed anyone, as you noted, guns placed in the wrong situation or hands they then becomes dangerous and persons killed senselessly. When you noted that if stricter gun laws were in place then we would not have these concerns; then I started thinking about the death penalty and whether that has been deterrence. What be a factor to reduce the element of deaths by firearms when the death penalty has not? 2) As I read over your posting, I thought of some points to discuss further. We all can agree that senseless deaths occurred due to how guns are readily available in the streets. There are some places in the world where officers do not carry guns. Restriction on access due to the mental state can help to lessen some senseless deaths that have affected our lives. In focusing on the constitution, why in your opinion do you believe there is such a resistance to amend or change the second amendment? 3)As I read over your posting, I can certainly appreciate your honesty as you are not a proponent of gay marriage. However; you put aside your own personal beliefs and focused on the issue of whether persons who identify themselves as being gay should have the right by law to marry one another. When we think of our beliefs and how strongly those beliefs affect our decisions making on a particular issue or situation, it does impact us. Gay marriage and gay rights is a hot topic that many have different views on what should or should not be allowed by the laws of this country. So you noted that if two are in love then they should have the same rights as those who identify as heterosexual. So in picking this topic, and with having such strong convictions of your beliefs that this type of lifestyle is inappropriate, what changes if any did you have when you looked at arguing this side of the issue? Did you find yourself though you may not agree, having a better understanding of their plight for equal rights of those who are heterosexual?
Background image of page 1

Answers

CourseLover
(12)
Status NEW Posted 28 Nov 2017 07:11 AM My Price 10.00

-----------  ----------- H-----------ell-----------o S-----------ir/-----------Mad-----------am ----------- Th-----------ank----------- yo-----------u f-----------or -----------usi-----------ng -----------our----------- we-----------bsi-----------te -----------and----------- ac-----------qui-----------sit-----------ion----------- of----------- my----------- po-----------ste-----------d s-----------olu-----------tio-----------ns.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age-----------

Not Rated(0)