The definition of what content is appropriate for certain levels of rating do seem to have evolved over the past several years. I have noticed that more sexual content and coarse language seems to have made its way into movies that are rated PG-13. However, when I think about this change I wonder if simple economics are at play. Previously, these movies that had coarse language and sexual content (especially nudity) would have been given an R rating. Today however, many of these films are being rated PG-13 and I would argue it is being done to attract the 13-16 year old movie crowd. If the MPAA continued to rate movies with an R rating, they would be denying themselves millions of customers each week that would otherwise be unable to attend the movies by themselves. Do you feel this is a credible argument to possibly explain the liberalization of the ratings of recent films?

CourseLover

(12)

Status NEW Posted 28 Nov 2017 09:11 AM My Price 10.00

-----------  ----------- H-----------ell-----------o S-----------ir/-----------Mad-----------am ----------- Th-----------ank----------- yo-----------u f-----------or -----------usi-----------ng -----------our----------- we-----------bsi-----------te -----------and----------- ac-----------qui-----------sit-----------ion----------- of----------- my----------- po-----------ste-----------d s-----------olu-----------tio-----------ns.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age-----------

Not Rated(0)

• Buy Answer