CHANGE SENTENCES AND PUT YOUR OWN, THE RED ONE IS NOT INCLUDED.

 

1: If the movement of people, food, and manufactured goods can have such a negative impact on public health, should steps be taken to reduce these flows? What other options are there for lowering the spread of global diseases?

 

1: if the movement of people, food, and manufactured goods can have such a negative impact on public health, we can use the positive impact which improves access to the medicines, medical information, and training that can help treat or cure these diseases.

2: Drug companies and governments not have the ability to ship drugs to remote parts of the world affected by outbreaks of disease.

 

 

But which steps should be taken to reduce these flows from these negative impacts:

The movement of people:

 

1: we should to look at the factors why do the people are leaving their homeland, and what was written by incomplete democratization, so In that case the democratic countries, and wealthier countries should to help by support to help those people moving to democratic state, and that will take time.

2: we should to he the countries have the political instability to have the stability, and political regime can satisfy the people.

3: we should to look to the connection between the infection disease, and economic development, and we have to develop their economy related to developing countries.

4: the authorities have to control traveling, and people by asking them to have medical certificate prove that they have no medical disease can move between the people like tuberculosis.

The movement of goods, & food:

1: we have to have the question about safety standard for food production, & processing,

2: we have to increase the capabilities and refrigeration technology.

3: we have to send the new technology, and to train the people living in those countries about the hygiene, quality, process, and the standard of the products.

 

What other options are there for lowering the spread of global diseases?

 

Other options are there for lowering the spread of global diseases:

1: to prevent the war.

2: to help the people to have a good job.

3: to help the people who living in those countries to have insurance.

4: to help the authorities to build democratic states.

5: to give the people who live in rural areas good reason not to leave the agriculture to move to urban areas.

6: to build educational institutes will improve the quality of the people.

 

2: How does increased trade in food lead to the spread of food-borne illnesses?

 

The import for the food, and people tend to buy cheaper food, and this increase partly related to consumer preferences, and this allow to increase the access to foreign markets, and that will raise the question about safety standards for food production and processing.

 

What measures can be taken to reduce the incidence of these diseases?

 

1: we have to have the question about safety standard for food production, & processing,

2: we have to increase the capabilities and refrigeration technology.

3: we have to send the new technology, and to train the people living in those countries about the hygiene, quality, process, and the standard of the products.

 

3: How do you feel about genetically modified organisms (GMOs)? Do you feel that the benefits outweigh the costs of producing food in this manner? Why or why not?

 

Genetically modified organisms:

Genetically modified organisms will improve these organisms. These changes may involve making them, 1: more resistant to parasites,2: grow faster, or 3: yield higher quantities of protein.

I'm with the school say that GMOS is not good because of that:

1: it allows for increased food production, and nutritional support.

2: it will help the people have serious problem to reduce the health problems around the world.

Because of that we made what do we need, I mean that if there is a health problem and we need to modify food to create for example vitamin A, we just we do that under super vision, Let me ask you a question if you have to choose to eat, natural vegetable, & GMOS vegetable what will you choose, and about what did Will reduce the hunger in the developing countries, yes that is true we can do program especially to those people, but with limitation

3: GMOS food will cause less environmental damage than their unmodified counterparts, that when it can be good but not truth, look at the long term damage when the people depend on those kind of food, what will happen? you will continue doing that but at the end you will find the farmer prefer the easy way, let's be positive and to continue in the right manner instead of the unexpected consequences, if we need to develop something as like that we should to study that for years.

My opinion:

in my opinion, that is good to do something and to think about the world, but let me think with you about the big issues, when you try to fight the nature, do you think that can happen? may be you think so, but in the truth you will c reate another type of problem we don't know, and that is not mean to stop what you do , no we should continue covering the whole world, but in needed, look at the word NEED