Martinakom

Not Rated (0)

$12/per page/Negotiable

About Martinakom

Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD

Expertise:
Accounting,Applied Sciences See all
Accounting,Applied Sciences,Architecture and Design,Biology,Business & Finance,Calculus,Chemistry,Computer Science,Geology Hide all
Teaching Since: Jul 2017
Last Sign in: 398 Weeks Ago, 4 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 5023
Tutorials Posted: 5024
Category > Law Posted 17 Jan 2018 My Price 7.00

For nearly a century, the 'gold standard' of forensic science has been fingerprints.

For nearly a century, the ‘gold standard’ of forensic science has been fingerprints. In light of issues such as the Mayfield misidentification by the FBI described in your text and other arguments, provide argument either defending the importance of fingerprints today or the argument that they are no longer as accurate or important as other forms of forensic science used to identify a person. Provide at least several examples that support your statement.

Answers

Martinakom
Not Rated (0)
Status NEW Posted 17 Jan 2018 04:01 AM My Price 7.00

Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- Â-----------  -----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r y-----------our----------- in-----------ter-----------est----------- an-----------d b-----------uyi-----------ng -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I----------- wi-----------ll -----------be -----------qui-----------ckl-----------y

Not Rated(0)