Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
Last Sign in: | 5 Weeks Ago |
Questions Answered: | 7559 |
Tutorials Posted: | 7341 |
BS,MBA, PHD
Adelphi University/Devry
Apr-2000 - Mar-2005
HOD ,Professor
Adelphi University
Sep-2007 - Apr-2017
Assignment Task – Case Analysis
This assignment is in two parts, you must complete both parts. Question 1 Does the law relating to occupiers’ liability provide adequate protection to visitors and trespassers without resulting in an excessive burden on the occupier of land? Critically analyse the approach of the court by focusing on the judgments in the following cases: • Jolley v Sutton London Borough Council LBC [2000] 1 WLR 1082 • Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450 • British Railways Board v Herrington [1972] AC 877 • Tomlinson V Congleton Borough Council [2002] EWCA Civ 39
Question 2 The restrictions contained in the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984 relating to duty of care owed to trespassers and damages are unjustified. Critically discuss to what extent you agree with this statement. Please answer by giving reference to relevant case law.
Law----------- of----------- To-----------rt -----------2 L-----------and----------- an-----------d O-----------the-----------r T-----------ort-----------s ----------- Ca-----------se -----------Ana-----------lys-----------is-----------