The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 56 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 7570 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 7352 |
BS,MBA, PHD
Adelphi University/Devry
Apr-2000 - Mar-2005
HOD ,Professor
Adelphi University
Sep-2007 - Apr-2017
Week 1: Exploring Instructional Leadership through the Instructional Core and Self-Assessments
NELP Standard 4: Learning and Instruction
Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to evaluate, develop, and implement coherent systems of curriculum, instruction, data systems, supports, and assessment.
Component 4.3 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
develop, and implement formal and informal culturally responsive and accessible assessments that
support data-informed instructional improvement and student learning and well-being.
PSEL 4: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
Effective educational leaders develop and support intellectually rigorous and coherent systems of curriculum, instruction, and assessment to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.
Texas Principal Standards Pillar: Data-driven Instruction
Principal Domain and Competency
Domain II: Leading Learning
Competency 4
Domain II
Course-level Objectives (CLOs):
Week 1 Learning Objectives (W1LO):
4. W1LO4: (CLO5) Program Requirements: Prepare Progress Check for submission.
Overview:
In Week 1 of this course you will examine a framework to help instructional leaders understand that the learner, curriculum, and instruction are interrelated. Change one part of this relationship, and you have to consider changes in the other two. Accountability in this relationship is both external and internal. External accountability addresses the question - how well are we doing? Internal accountability addresses the question - what are we doing? This week you will focus on the components of the Instructional Core, complete an Educational Leadership Profile Self-Assessment, and examine the seven levers for Quality Instruction and Culture. Rigor in learning activities, content, and instruction are a priority for instructional leaders of the 21st century.
Resources:
Week 1 Readings: Be sure you are logged into Blackboard in order to access all of the readings from these links. All References listed below are in APA format for citation.
1. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading Educational Change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–338. https://doi-org.libproxy.lamar.edu/10.1080/0305764032000122005
2. Suh, R. (2017). Instructional Leadership. (p.11) Salem Press Encyclopedia. Retrieved from
3. City, E. A., Elmore, R. F., Fiarman, S. E., & Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional rounds in education (p. 30). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. http://www.macombfsi.net/uploads/1/5/4/4/1544586/instructional_rounds_-_principles.pdf
4. Elmore, R. (2010). Leading the instructional core. In Conversation (Vol. 11, No. 3, p. 1-12). http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/policyfunding/leadership/summer2010.pdf
5. Desravines, J., Aquino, J., & Fenton, B. (2016). Breakthrough principals: A step-by-step guide to building stronger schools (p.49-55). John Wiley & Sons.
6. Bambrick-Santoyo, P. (2018). Leverage Leadership 2.0: A Practical Guide to Building Exceptional Schools (p.365-366). John Wiley & Sons.
Week 1 Assignment Rubric:
Use the Rubric to guide your writing.
|
Tasks |
Level 1: Does not meet the minimum criteria 0 points |
Level 2: Approaches minimum criteria 4 points |
Level 3: Meets minimum criteria 6 points |
Level 4: Meets target criteria 8 points |
|
Part 1A: Instructional Core Summary Candidate examines the elements of an instructional leader through the fundamentals of the Instructional Core by defining the three elements and listing the seven principles for improving student learning NELP 4 PSEL 4 W1LO1: (CLO1)
|
Candidate lists the three elements of the instructional core. (K) |
Candidate lists the three elements of the instructional core with little definition. (K) |
Candidate defines the three elements of the instructional core briefly and may lack clarity. (K) |
Candidate defines the three elements of the instructional core comprehensively and with clarity. (K) |
|
Candidate provides no information on the seven principles for improving student learning. (K) |
Candidate provides information, but no list of the seven principles for improving student learning. (K) |
Candidate provides an incomplete list of the seven principles for improving student learning. (K) |
Candidate provides in depth list of the seven principles for improving student learning. (. (K) |
|
|
Candidate articulates no supporting evidence from the readings and lectures in the summary. (S) |
Candidate articulates little supporting evidence from the readings and lectures in the summary. (S) |
Candidate articulates general supporting evidence from the readings and lectures in the summary. (S) |
Candidate articulates comprehensive evidence from the readings and lectures for specificity and clarity in the summary. (S) |
|
|
Part 1B: Self-Assessment Reflections Candidate examines the elements of an instructional leader through the fundamentals of the Instructional Core by defining the three elements and listing the seven principles for improving student learning NELP 4 PSEL 4 W1LO1: (CLO1) W1LO2: (CLO1) |
Candidate demonstrates little or no self-reflection regarding their identifiable Areas of Development or Areas of Strength from the School Leader Self-Assessment Tool. (M) |
Candidate demonstrates superficial self-reflection regarding their identifiable Areas of Development or Areas of Strength from the School Leader Self-Assessment Tool and is lacking in specificity and clarity. (M) |
Candidate demonstrates an emerging depth of self-reflection regarding their identifiable Areas of Development or Areas of Strength from the School Leader Self-Assessment Tool and may be lacking in specificity and clarity. (M) |
Candidate demonstrates and articulates a depth of knowledge of one’s self- regarding their identifiable Areas of Development or Areas of Strength from the School Leader Self-Assessment Tool with specificity and clarity. (M) |
|
Candidate demonstrates little or no self-reflection regarding their identifiable weaknesses and strengths from the ELP. (M) |
Candidate demonstrates superficial self-reflection regarding their identifiable weaknesses and strengths from the ELP and is lacking in specificity and clarity. (M) |
Candidate demonstrates an emerging depth of self-reflection regarding their identifiable weaknesses and strengths from the ELP and may be lacking in specificity and clarity. (M) |
Candidate demonstrates and articulates a depth of knowledge through self-reflection regarding their identifiable weaknesses and strengths from the ELP with specificity and clarity. (M) |
|
|
Candidate articulates no supporting evidence from the readings, lectures, or self-assessments in the reflections. (S) |
Candidate articulates little supporting evidence from the readings, lectures, or self-assessments in the reflections. (S) |
Candidate articulates general supporting evidence from the readings, lectures, or self-assessments in the reflections. (S) |
Candidate articulates comprehensive evidence from the readings, lectures, or self-assessments with specificity and clarity in the reflections. (S) |
|
|
Part 2: Seven Levers: Define & Examples Candidate defines each of the Seven Leadership Lever and gives an example of each Instructional Levers and Cultural Levers used to improve teacher instruction or student achievement. NELP 4.3 PSEL 4 W1LO2: (CLO1) |
Candidate provides no definition for the Seven Leadership Levers. (K) |
Candidate defines with little explanation the Seven Leadership Levers. (K) |
Candidate defines with a general understanding the Seven Leadership Levers. (K) |
Candidate defines with depth, specificity, and clarity the Seven Leadership Levers. (K) |
|
Candidate demonstrates little or no ability to give examples of Instructional Levers or Cultural Levers to improve teacher instruction or student achievement. (M) |
Candidate demonstrates superficial ability to give examples of Instructional Levers or Cultural Levers to improve teacher instruction or student achievement and is lacking in specificity and clarity. (M) |
Candidate demonstrates an emerging depth of knowledge and ability to give examples of Instructional Levers or Cultural Levers to improve teacher instruction or student achievement and may be lacking in specificity and clarity. (M) |
Candidate demonstrates and articulates a depth of knowledge and ability regarding examples of Instructional Levers or Cultural Levers to improve teacher instruction or student achievement with specificity and clarity. (M) |
|
|
Part 3: Draft: PD Initial Information Candidate uses data sets to identify trends, patterns, and themes from student work, TAPR, and teachers’ professional development needs survey to plan provide the Initial Information for a 3-Day Professional Development. NELP 4.4 PSEL 4 W1LO3: (CLO2) |
Candidate demonstrates little or no ability to provide initial information for a 3-Day Professional Development. (S) |
Candidate demonstrates an ambiguous ability to provide initial information for a 3-Day Professional Development. and is lacking in specificity and clarity. (S) |
Candidate demonstrates an emerging depth of ability to provide initial information for a 3-Day Professional Development and may be lacking in specificity and clarity. (S) |
Candidate demonstrates and articulates a depth of knowledge and ability regarding initial information for a 3-Day Professional Development with specificity and clarity. (S) |
|
Writing Elements: W1LO3: (CLO2) |
Candidate had spelling, grammar, or technical writing errors. 0-points |
|
|
Candidate had no spelling, grammar, or technical writing errors. 3-points |
Part 1A: Instructional Core Summary
Directions:
A. Summary W1LO1:(CLO1): Using the Basic Writing Elements Model found in the Resource section of this course, complete the following summary regarding the Instructional Core.
B. Cite any sources and/or readings used as evidence to support your statements in APA format.
|
Directions: Compose 1-2 paragraphs (minimum 200-word) summary of the Instructional Core, by Dr. Richard Elmore from Harvard University, 2008. Define each of the three elements of the core and list the seven principles for improving student learning. |
|
|
Summary: |
City, Elmore, Fiarman, and Teitel (2009), explained the Instructional Core as…. |
Reference
City, E. A., Elmore, R. F., Fiarman, S. E., & Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional rounds in education (p. 30). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Part 1B: Self-Assessments: School Leader Tool and Educational Leadership Profile
Directions:
A. Self-Assessment Reflections W1LO2:(CLO1): Complete the following in-depth self-reflections regarding the results of your completed Self-Assessments by identifying your strengths and weaknesses not only a Leader, but an Instructional Leader. Use the self-reflective model of What? So What? Now What? found in the Resource section of your course.
a. Access online School Leader Self-Assessment Tool (Access PowerPoint in Week 1 for instructions):
https://www.aitsl.edu.au/tools-resources/resource/school-leadership-self-assessment-tool
b. Print and complete Educational Leadership Profile:
https://www.ndcel.org/cms/lib/ND07001211/Centricity/Domain/132/ELPpaper.pdf
B. Cite any sources and/or readings used as evidence to support your statements in APA format.
|
School Leader Self-Assessment Tool: |
Directions: After completing the School Leader Self-Assessment Tool, compose 1-2 paragraphs (200-word) describing your identified Areas for Development and Areas for Strength. |
|
The School Leader Self-Assessment Tool assists current and aspiring principals to locate their practice within the Leadership Profiles. Identify your strengths and opportunities for development. |
The School Leader Self-Assessment Tool revealed one area for development I needed to address was…. |
|
Educational Leadership Profile: |
Directions: After completing the Educational Leadership Profile (ELP) Self-Assessment, compose 1-2 paragraphs (200-word) describing your results from the assessment listed below. Items resulting in a 1 or 2 score on your ELP Self-Assessment should be identified as weaknesses. Elements scoring a 5 or 6 should be identified as strengths. |
|
The Education Leadership Profile is designed to gather information to help school leaders strengthen their abilities to improve learning for all students. |
The Educational Leadership Profile revealed one of my weakness areas was…. |
Reference
On-Line Survey Page/School Leader Self-Assessment Tool. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/tools-resources/resource/school-leadership-self-assessment-tool
On-Line Surveys Page / Educational Leadership Profile (ELP). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ndcel.org/Page/389
Part 2: The Seven Levers for Quality Instruction and Culture
Directions:
A. The Seven Levers W1LO1:(CLO1): Review the principle core instructional and cultural areas that are identified as the Seven Levers. These principles allow for “consistent, transformational, and replicable growth” in learning. They are found in your Leverage Leadership 2.0 textbook on pages 8, 365, and 366. In the chart below define each Lever. Then, give an example that can be used on a campus to improve teacher instruction or student achievement. Examples are listed in gray for you to reference, delete examples prior to beginning.
B. Use 12 pt. black font: Times New Roman. The table cells will expand to fit your text.
|
Instructional Levers |
Cultural Levers |
|||||
|
1. Data-driven Instruction |
2. Instructional Planning |
3. Observation and Feedback |
4. Professional Development
|
5. Student Culture |
6. Staff Culture |
7. Managing School Leadership Teams |
|
Define: |
Define: |
Define: |
Define: |
Define: |
Define: |
Define: |
|
Define the road map for rigor and adapt teaching to meet students’ needs (Brambrick-Santoyo, p.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example: |
Example: |
Example: |
Example: |
Example: |
Example: |
Example: |
|
Math teachers will meet to create a roadmap to increase rigor and improve student EOC scores. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference
Bambrick-Santoyo, P. (2018). Leverage Leadership 2.0: A Practical Guide to Building Exceptional Schools (p.365-366). John Wiley & Sons.
Part 3: Draft: Element for Professional Development:
Comprehensive School-Level Instructional Leadership 3-Day Professional Development Plan
The final signature assessment in this course is to write a comprehensive, school-level instructional leadership 3-Day professional development plan. This plan will be due in Week 4 and include multiple elements. This week you will focus on one of the elements called The Initial Information.
Directions:
A. Data Sets W1LO3:(CLO2): Working collaboratively with a small group on your campus evaluate the data sets given with this week’s assignment, begin to identify trends, patterns, and themes from student work, the TAPR, and the results from a teachers’ professional development needs survey to focus your 3-Day Professional Development Plan. Use suggestions from your collaborative team, data, research, and readings to decide what area(s) of need you will focus on for this 3-Day Professional Development Plan.
Examples are listed in gray for you to reference, delete examples prior to beginning.
B. Complete the Professional Development Initial Information.
C. Use 12 pt. black font: Times New Roman. The table cells will expand to fit your text.
|
School-Level 3-Day Professional Development Plan Template |
|
|
Professional Development Initial Information Focus of Topic: (Topic) Objective: (Objective) |
|
|
School Name:
|
School Name |
|
Instructional Leader |
Your Name |
|
Professional Development Committee Members: |
Assistant Principals, Instructional Coach, Curriculum Specialist, Department Heads, Leadership Team |
|
Date plan was created: |
August 2018 |
|
Dates plan will be conducted: |
August 20-22 2018 |
|
Dates plan will be in effect: |
September 1, 2018 through June 1, 2019 |
|
Date by which time plan will be updated and revised for upcoming school year: |
July 1, 2019 |
|
Resources to purchase: |
Books Small group tools Lunch for staff |
|
Cost: |
$600 |
EDL-----------D 5-----------352----------- We-----------ek -----------1 E-----------xpl-----------ori-----------ng -----------Ins-----------tru-----------cti-----------ona-----------l L-----------ead-----------ers-----------hip----------- th-----------rou-----------gh -----------the----------- In-----------str-----------uct-----------ion-----------al -----------Cor-----------e a-----------nd -----------Sel-----------f-A-----------sse-----------ssm-----------ent-----------s ----------- ----------- -----------