The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 56 Weeks Ago, 4 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 7570 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 7352 |
BS,MBA, PHD
Adelphi University/Devry
Apr-2000 - Mar-2005
HOD ,Professor
Adelphi University
Sep-2007 - Apr-2017
SPAN 101 Critical, Integrative Thinking Essay on Culture
General description of the assignment
Students will demonstrate knowledge and understanding of particular aspects of the culture of the countries where Spanish is spoken by writing a reflective essay in English. SPAN 101 students will research and write about one of the following topics: greetings, school, family, or sports.
Assignment Goals
This assignment is linked to two of our four Program Learning Outcomes in World Language and Cultures. Students who complete course work in the World Languages and Cultures Program will be able to: (1) apply cultural knowledge to facilitate communication with native speakers and (2) and analyze cultural differences.
The assignment is also connected to the following course outcome on our SPAN 101 syllabus: Compare and contrast typical cultural frames of reference held by Anglos and Hispanics on interpersonal space, time, food, family, work, sports, pastimes, politics, and religion.
Having students reflect on how the target language makes itself meaningful within its social and cultural context helps them not only to make judgments about the target language culture but also to critically examine their own language and culture.
Description of Assignment Specifics
Using Microsoft WORD and 12th font size, SPAN 101 students will write a reflective essay in English 750-1,000 words in length. Following MLA style, students will have at least one primary source and at least three secondary sources to address similarities and differences between the United States and Spanish-speaking countries on the cultural topic(s) chosen.
Students will receive the assignment the second week of the semester along with the Vincennes University Critical Thinking Rubric: Humanistic and Artistic. The first draft of the essay will be due the tenth week of the semester. The final draft will be due the thirteenth week of the semester.
Explanation of the Value of the Assignment Relative to the Overall Course Grade
The essay will weigh 10% percent of the total course grade.
Explanation of the problem, question, conflict, or issue
SPAN 101 students will choose to do oneof the four following reflective essays.
Context or scenario for all assignments:
Imagine that you want to communicate with a person from a Spanish-speaking country. Although this person has some degree of proficiency in English, he or she is not well acquainted with US culture. For example, think of a student from Latin America or Spain who has not been in the United States long and is starting classes at Vincennes University.
Assignment A
Essay on problems (culture shock) created by cultural differences in greetings and goodbyes and suggestions to help a student from a Spanish-speaking country studying in the United States deal with those problems
SPAN 101 students will address the following questions in a reflective essay:
There are important differences between the way people greet and take leave of one another in the Spanish-speaking world and in the United States. Think about differences in the following areas: interpersonal space, kisses, handshakes, hugs, and attitudes toward time. What are the greatest problems that the cultural differences in this area would create for a student from Latin America or Spain who is studying in the United States? What specific suggestions do you have to help the student overcome these problems, or, in other words, to deal with the culture shock?
How could you communicate to the person from the target culture that you are aware of and appreciate his or her cultural frame of reference? As a person from a culture different from that of a Spanish-speaking country, what are some of your own assumptions and values in the area of greeting, saying goodbye, and social interaction that this person might not understand about you? Do you exhibit typical North American values or are you different from the norm—perhaps in this particular area even somewhat like most people from Latin America or Spain? How could you help this person understand your assumptions and values, and--at the same time--show respect for his or her culture?
You may point out differences in greeting and saying good-bye to others within the Spanish-speaking world.
Assignment B
Essay on problems (culture shock) created by cultural differences in education and suggestions to help a student from a Spanish-speaking country studying in the United States deal with those problems
SPAN 101 students will address the following questions in a reflective essay:
There are important differences between education in the Spanish-speaking world and in the United States. Think about differences in the following areas: educational system from kindergarten through university, courses taught, college entrance requirements, access to desired college major, tuition costs, and housing for college students. What are the greatest problems that the cultural differences in this area would create for a student from Latin America or Spain who is studying in the United States? What specific suggestions do you have to help the student overcome these problems, or, in other words, to deal with the culture shock?
How could you communicate to the person from the target culture that you are aware of and appreciate his or her cultural frame of reference? As a person from a culture different from that of a Spanish-speaking country, what are some of your own assumptions and values in the area of education that this person might not understand about you? Do you exhibit typical North American values or are you different from the norm—perhaps in this particular area even somewhat like most people from Latin America or Spain? How could you help this person understand your assumptions and values, and--at the same time--show respect for his or her culture?
Assignment C
Essay on problems (culture shock) created by cultural differences in families and suggestions to help a student from a Spanish-speaking country studying in the United States deal with those problems
SPAN 101 students will address the following questions in a reflective essay:
Although each family within a certain culture does not always exhibit the general tendencies within that culture, in general there are important differences between families in the Spanish-speaking world and families in the United States. There are also certainly regional differences in families within the Spanish-speaking world and within the United States. Think about differences in the following areas: marriage, last names, values taught to children, family size, concepts of the extended family and the nuclear family, and attitudes toward time. What are the greatest problems that the cultural differences in this area would create for a student from Latin America or Spain who is studying in the United States? What specific suggestions do you have to help the student overcome these problems, or, in other words, to deal with the culture shock?
How could you communicate to the person from the target culture that you are aware of and appreciate his or her cultural frame of reference? As a person from a culture different from that of a Spanish-speaking country, what are some of your own assumptions and values in the area of family that this person might not understand about you? Do you exhibit typical North American values or are you different from the norm—perhaps in this particular area even somewhat like most people from Latin America or Spain? How could you help this person understand your assumptions and values, and--at the same time--show respect for his or her culture?
Assignment D
Essay on problems (culture shock) created by cultural differences in sports and suggestions to help a student from a Spanish-speaking country studying in the United States deal with those problems
SPAN 101 students will address the following questions in a reflective essay:
There are important differences between sports in the Spanish-speaking world and in the United States. Think about differences in the following areas: passion for soccer or baseball in Spanish-speaking countries versus passion for baseball, basketball, hockey, or football in the United States; the ways fans express their passion in Spanish-speaking countries and in the United States; the cultural and political rivalries sometimes symbolized by rivalries between teams in both cultures; and the influence of famous sports personalities in both the Hispanic and Anglo cultures. What are the greatest problems that the cultural differences in this area would create for a student from Latin America or Spain who is studying in the United States? What specific suggestions do you have to help the student overcome these problems, or, in other words, to deal with the culture shock?
How could you communicate to the person from the target culture that you are aware of and appreciate his or her cultural frame of reference? As a person from a culture different from that of a Spanish-speaking country, what are some of your own assumptions and values in the area of sports that this person might not understand about you? Do you exhibit typical North American values or are you different than the norm—perhaps in this particular area even somewhat like most people from Latin America or Spain? How could you help this person understand your assumptions and values, and--at the same time--show respect for his or her culture?
Evidence: selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion
SPAN 101 students must include at least one of the following primary sources: an interview with a native speaker of Spanish, a video or a film involving native speakers. Students need three secondary sources. As secondary sources they will refer to scholarly articles on the cultural topic(s) with which they are dealing as they address the questions for the essay. Use Google Scholar to find articles.
Influence of context and assumptions
The assignment focuses the student’s attention on the importance of a cultural context on communication. Students will grapple with how cultural frames of reference influence cross-cultural communication.
Student position
As students do this assignment, they will examine their own ideas and attitudes they had before taking SPAN 101 and consider whether those notions and perspectives had affected their interaction with native-speakers of Spanish. Students will explain how learning Spanish language and Hispanic culture has influenced their understanding of people from Spanish-speaking countries. Also, students will consider how they might help native-speakers of Spanish understand assumptions and values typical of people in the United States, and--at the same time--show respect for the Spanish-speaking culture. Students will even be examining how reflective their own assumptions and values are of US culture in general.
Conclusions and related outcomes
The reflective essay on cultural topics in SPAN 101 will be aligned with both Education Outcome Competencies from the State of Indiana and Program Outcomes dealing with culture for students in Vincennes University’s World Languages and Cultures Department.
World Languages and Cultures
Critical Thinking, Integrative Thinking Grading Rubric Worth 100 points
Excellent= high A, Advanced= low A, Acceptable= C, Developing=D, Inadequate= F
|
|
Inadequate |
Developing |
Acceptable |
Advanced |
Excellent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanation of topic |
Points: 0 (0%) |
Points: 8(8%) |
Points: 10(10%) |
Points: 12(12%) |
Points: 13(13%) |
|
choice |
Fails to identify, |
Identifies the topic |
Clearly identifies |
Clearly and |
Clearly and |
|
|
summarize, or |
of choice, but does |
and summarizes |
completely |
completely |
|
|
explain the topic of |
not summarize or |
the issues, but |
identifies and |
identifies and |
|
|
choice. Represents |
explain the issues |
does not clearly |
summarizes the |
summarizes the |
|
|
the issues |
clearly or |
explain why/how |
issues, and |
issues, and |
|
|
inaccurately or |
sufficiently. |
the issues are |
explains why/how |
explains fully why |
|
|
inappropriately. |
|
problems or create |
they are problems, |
the issues can |
|
|
|
|
questions. |
questions, conflicts |
create conflicts; |
|
|
|
|
|
or issues of |
recognizes issues |
|
|
|
|
|
concern. |
that are not |
|
|
|
|
|
|
explicitly stated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence |
Points: 0 (0%) |
Points: 8(8%) |
Points: 10(10%) |
Points: 12(12%) |
Points: 13(13%) |
|
Selecting and using |
Does not present |
Presents limited |
Presents |
Clearly |
Fully recognizes |
|
information to |
arguments or |
arguments or |
arguments or |
understands the |
and evaluates |
|
investigate a point of |
supporting |
information but |
information with |
arguments or |
arguments and |
|
view or conclusion |
information that |
fails to evaluate the |
limited evaluation |
information from |
evidence from |
|
|
counts as evidence. |
quality of the |
of evidence from |
different |
different |
|
|
(No research |
evidence. (Fails to |
different |
perspectives and |
perspectives and |
|
|
completed; no |
research each side |
perspectives. |
expresses |
uses skillful |
|
|
citations.) |
equally or poor |
(Research |
judgment about the |
judgment. |
|
|
|
quality or |
represents multiple |
evidence. |
(Research is |
|
|
|
incomplete |
perspectives but |
(Research should |
extensive and uses |
|
|
|
sources.) |
some questionable |
be more extensive, |
high quality primary |
|
|
|
|
sources.) |
but uses quality |
and secondary |
|
|
|
|
|
sources.) |
resources to fully |
|
|
|
|
|
|
develop multiple |
|
|
|
|
|
|
perspectives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Influence of context |
Points: 0 (0%) |
Points:8(8%) |
Points: 10(10%) |
Points: 12(12%) |
Points: 13(13%) |
|
and assumptions (i.e. |
Presents issues as |
Limited |
Identifies multiple |
Fully identifies |
Thoroughly and |
|
cultural/social, |
having no |
identification of |
contexts and/or |
multiple contexts |
systematically |
|
educational, |
connections to other |
contexts and/or |
multiple |
and assumptions, |
analyzes own and |
|
technological, political, |
conditions or |
assumptions |
assumptions but |
both author's own |
others assumptions |
|
scientific, economic, |
contexts. No analysis |
related to issue. |
limited application |
and others, and |
and relevant |
|
ethical, personal |
of assumptions. |
|
to issue. Limited |
integrates them |
contexts. Fully |
|
experience) |
|
|
recognition of own |
into the discussion |
applies the analysis |
|
|
|
|
and others |
as it applies to the |
of the contexts and |
|
|
|
|
contexts and/or |
issue. |
assumptions to the |
|
|
|
|
assumptions. |
|
topic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student's position : |
Points: 0 (0%) |
Points: 12(12%) |
Points: 14(14%) |
Points: 16(16%) |
Points: 18(18%) |
|
|
Fails to formulate |
Vaguely states or |
States position. |
Formulates a clear |
States a specific, |
|
|
and clearly express |
implies a position |
Awareness of |
and precise |
imaginative, and |
|
|
or imply own point of |
regarding the |
other perspectives; |
personal point of |
reasonable |
|
|
view regarding issue. |
issue, and shows |
but considers only |
view concerning |
personal point of |
|
|
|
limited awareness |
minor objections |
issues. Considers |
view concerning the |
|
|
|
of other |
and only the |
a range of |
issue. Recognizes |
|
|
|
perspectives and |
weakest and/or |
alternative |
limits of own |
|
|
|
no discussion of |
most easily refuted |
positions and |
position while |
|
|
|
strengths and |
alternative |
discusses |
synthesizing other |
|
|
|
weaknesses of |
positions. Minimal |
strengths and |
perspectives into |
|
|
|
other's viewpoint. |
discussion of |
|
own position. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strengths and |
weaknesses of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
weaknesses of |
other's positions. |
|
|
|
|
|
others viewpoints. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusions and |
Points: 0 (0%) |
Points: 8 (8%) |
Points: 10(10%) |
Points: 12(12%) |
Points: 13(13%) |
|
related outcomes |
No consideration of |
Limited |
Conclusions follow |
Most conclusions |
Conclusions and |
|
(implications and |
implications of |
connections |
from the |
clearly follow from |
implications are |
|
consequences) |
personal choice and |
between the |
information, but |
the information |
fully fleshed out in a |
|
|
related outcomes. |
conclusions drawn |
conclusions are of |
considered and |
systematic way that |
|
|
|
and the information |
limited |
integrate multiple |
follows from |
|
|
|
provided; little or |
significance; |
perspectives. |
consideration of |
|
|
|
no discussion of |
position |
Position |
multiple |
|
|
|
implication of the |
assumptions and |
assumptions and |
perspectives; |
|
|
|
position taken. |
implications of |
implications are |
conclusions and |
|
|
|
|
conclusions are not |
explored, although |
implications are |
|
|
|
|
explored. |
full significance |
insightful and |
|
|
|
|
|
might not be |
creative. |
|
|
|
|
|
developed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrative Reasoning |
No integration of |
Points: 8 (8%) |
Points: 10(10%) |
Points: 12(12%) |
Points: 14(14%) |
|
|
data, concepts, |
A minimal |
An emergent |
Effective |
A developed |
|
|
research, or other |
integration of data, |
integration of |
integration of |
integration of |
|
|
information from |
concepts, |
diverse data, |
diverse data, |
diverse data, |
|
|
diverse sources, |
research, or |
concepts, |
concepts, research |
concepts, research, |
|
|
disciplines, or |
theories from |
research, or |
or theories |
theories illustrates |
|
|
methodologies |
diverse sources, |
theories addresses |
indicates how |
varied cogent |
|
|
occurs. |
disciplines, or |
the elements or |
different |
approaches to the |
|
|
|
methodologies |
complexities of the |
disciplines, |
problem(s) or |
|
|
|
occurs. The |
issue(s) or |
methodologies, or |
issue(s). This |
|
|
|
integration is |
problem(s) using |
ways of knowing |
integration informs |
|
|
|
surface-level only |
information from |
interpret, analyze, |
the student’s |
|
|
|
but discusses more |
more than one |
and confront the |
position and |
|
|
|
than one way of |
methodology, |
problem(s) or |
conclusion(s) |
|
|
|
viewing the |
discipline, or way |
issue(s) |
effectively. |
|
|
|
issue(s). |
of knowing. |
addressed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grammar, Expression, |
Points: |
Points:5 (5%) |
Points: 6(6%) |
Points: 7(7%) |
Points: 8(8%) |
|
and Spelling |
0 (0%) |
Two to three |
One or two |
No major sentence |
Meets the |
|
|
Multiple significant |
significant |
sentence structure |
structure errors, a |
standards of written |
|
|
sentence structure |
sentence structure |
errors or districting |
few grammar |
English, with no |
|
|
errors that affect |
errors or numerous |
grammar errors; |
errors such as |
spelling errors. |
|
|
understanding; |
other distracting |
mostly clear |
agreement errors. |
Clear expression |
|
|
argument/evidence |
errors; some clarity |
presentation, |
Expression is |
that effectively and |
|
|
is unclearly |
or coherence |
though it might be |
clear, though |
concisely states |
|
|
presented; five or |
issues; three to five |
wordy or |
occasional |
issues, a position, |
|
|
more spelling errors. |
spelling errors. |
incoherent in |
awkwardness or |
and consequences. |
|
|
|
|
spots; two to three |
wordiness; one or |
|
|
|
|
|
spelling errors. |
two minor spelling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
errors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Documentation |
Points: |
Points:5 (5%) |
Points: 6(6%) |
Points: 7(7%) |
Points: 8(8%) |
|
|
0 (0%) |
An attempt to use |
Uses MLA format, |
Correctly uses |
Meets MLA |
|
|
Incomplete or no |
MLA to correctly |
but has three to |
MLA format, but |
standards without |
|
|
internal |
format, but at least |
five documentation |
some punctuation |
documentation |
|
|
documentation; |
six errors. Difficult |
errors. All sources |
or minor citation |
errors. Transitions |
|
|
failure to correctly |
to tell the |
are cited, but not |
errors. Clear |
between cited |
|
|
use MLA format |
difference between |
correctly or clearly. |
distinction between |
material and |
|
|
and/or plagiarism. |
what is cited and |
|
sources and |
author’s words are |
|
|
|
what is the author’s |
|
authors' words, |
clear, smooth, and |
|
|
|
words. |
|
though some |
effective. |
|
|
|
|
|
transitions are |
|
|
|
|
|
|
awkward. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MLA Documentation Style
Example of a Works-Cited Entry for a Book:
Blanco, José A. and Philip Redwine Donley. Aventuras: Primer curso de lengua española,
4th ed. Boston: VISTA Higher Learning, 2014. Print.
Example of a Works-Cited Entry for a Flash Cultura Episode in Aventuras:
“Encuentros en la plaza.” Perf. Silvina Márquez. Flash Cultura in Lección 1, Aventuras. Vhlcentral.com. Vista Higher Learning, 2014. Web. 25 March 2014.
Example of a Works-Cited Entry for a Magazine Article:
Schwartz, John. “The Great Food Migration.” Newsweek(Columbus Special Issue) Fall/Winter 1991:
58-62. Print.
Example of a Works-Cited Entry for a Web Site:
Kern, Soeren. “Muslims Angry Over Spanish Citizenship Offer to Jews.” The Clarion Project: Challenging Extremism, Promoting Dialogue.The Clarion Project, Inc. 24 Dec. 2012. Web. 15 Oct. 2013.
Note that the first date above refers to the date of publicationof the article on the web site.
The second date is when you accessed the articleon the Web.
Example of a Works-Cited Entry for Sources from Online Databases:
Huntington, Samuel P. “The Hispanic Challenge.” Foreign Policy. March/April 2004: 30+. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 14 Oct 2013.
Note that the date above refers to the date that you accessed the articleon the Web.
Online databases often have proper MLA citation at the end of the article.
Example of a Works-Cited Entry for a Lecture
Campbell, Lucy. Observations on Latin American families during class. Dept. of Modern Foreign Languages, Vincennes University, Vincennes, IN. 17 Oct. 2013. Lecture.
Example of a Works-Cited Entry for a Personal Interview
Rodríguez Contreras, Rafael Pablo. Personal interview. 19 Oct. 2013.
FORMAT of First Page
Mary Smith
Professor Gregory
SPAN 103
17 April 2014
Holidays and Celebrations in the English-Speaking and Spanish-speaking Worlds
Body of paper starts here.
FORMAT of Works Cited Page
Smith 3
Works Cited
Donley, Philip Redwine, and José A. Blanco. Aventuras: Primer curso de lengua española,
4th ed. Boston: VISTA Higher Learning, 2014. Print.
Gregory, Steven M. Observations on interpersonal space in Hispanic communication during class. Dept. of Modern Foreign Languages, Vincennes University, Vincennes, IN. 21 Aug. 2013. Lecture.
Huntington, Samuel P. “The Hispanic Challenge.” Foreign Policy. March/April 2004: 30+. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 14 Oct 2013.
Rodríguez Contreras, Rafael Pablo. Personal interview. 19 Oct. 2013.
Important Information Concerning Parenthetical References in the Body of the Paper
Please include internal citations. In other words, if possible, use page numbers in parentheses showing the source of your quote, statistic, or paraphrase.
For example:
According to José Susinos, Sorolla is “the Spanish painter whose work most reminds us of the French impressionists” (127).
Of course, electronic sources will probably not have page numbers. If that is the case, just make sure that you cite the article and its author so that your reader can find the source on your Works Cited page.
Please make sure that you have written the name of the author or the text that you are citing in the body of your paper so that your reader can refer to the author or work listed on your Works Cited page.
SPA-----------N 1-----------01 -----------Cri-----------tic-----------al,----------- In-----------teg-----------rat-----------ive----------- Th-----------ink-----------ing----------- Es-----------say----------- on----------- Cu-----------ltu-----------re-----------