1. i want the following questions answered in 140 to 200 each, in your own words. it's computer science and philosophy. i have attached the articles below and the link to number one.
3. 1 Net Neutrality is often a difficult idea to explain, because it is often confused with other ideas such as censorship or paying for different levels of internet service. How would you explain the concept of net neutrality to somebody who knows nothing about it? Make sure to explain why many think it is an 
4. important issue. . http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2009/10/42478-debating-net-neutrality/fulltext
6. 2.Lawrence Lessig writes that there is something "wrong with network owners telling content or service providers that they cannot access a meaningful broadband network unless they pay an access-tax." What does he mean by "wrong" and why does he think that it is wrong?

3. According to Christopher Yoo, what are the some of the advantages of not enforcing a widespread net neutrality policy?

4.Explain Tim Wu's arguments for thinking that without imposing net neutrality, innovation would be seriously hindered.

575Keeping the Internet Neutral?: TimWu and Christopher Yoo DebateTim Wuis Professor of Law at the Columbia Law School. He is theauthor of Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination (2003) andcoauthor, with Jack Goldsmith, ofWho Controls the Internet?(OxfordUniversity Press 2006).Christopher S. Yoois Professor of Law andDirector of the Technology and Entertainment Law Program at theVanderbilt University Law School. He is the author ofBeyond NetworkNeutrality(2005) andNetwork Neutrality and the Economics of Congestion(2006) and the coauthor, with Daniel F. Spulber, of the forthcomingNetworksinTelecommunications:EconomicsandLaw(CambridgeUniversity Press).Yoo:During the past year, network neutrality emerged as one of the mostcontroversial issues in Internet policy. Although the details of specificproposals differ, as a general matter, a network neutrality mandate wouldprohibit network owners from discriminating against particular applicationsand content providers. Network neutrality played a key role in the debatesover communications reform legislation that was pending before the SenateandtheHouseofRepresentatives,aswellasintheFederalCommunications Commission’s (“FCC”) clearance of the SBC-AT&T,Verizon-MCI, and AT&T-BellSouth mergers.1I am not convinced that deviations from network neutrality willnecessarily harm consumers and innovation. On the contrary, competitionand innovation might be better served if policymakers embraced a1. On the role that network neutrality played in congressional debates and the SBC-AT&T and Verizon-MCI mergers, see Christopher S. Yoo,Network Neutrality and theEconomics of Congestion, 94 GEO. L.J. 1847, 1859–60 (2006) [hereinafterEconomics ofCongestion]. On the AT&T-BellSouth merger, seeAT&T Inc. and BellSouth CorporationApplication for Transfer of Control, News Release, WC Docket No. 06-74 (Dec. 29, 2006)(merger conditions available at http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269275A1.pdf).

I/S: A JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY FOR THE INFORMATION SOCIETYLAWRENCELESSIGIn Support of Network Neutrality*Abstract:In order to preserve the rapid rate of innovation generated by the Internet,Congress must act to maintain the Internet’s network neutrality and its “end-to-end”design.To accomplish this goal, Congress should adopt the “Internet Freedoms”—access to content, use of applications, attachment of personal devices, andobtainment of service plan information—proposed by Federal CommunicationsCommission (“FCC”) Chairman Michael Powell.In addition to adopting thesefreedoms, Congress should further act to prevent access-tiering—whereby providingcontent or service on a network is contingent upon the payment of a fee.Adoptingan access-tiering policy would inhibit the fair competition of newly emergingInternet services and thereby delay further Internet developments at a time when theInternet is critical for the U.S. economy.Instead of adopting an access-tieringpolicy, Congress should preserve the current end-to-end design because it facilitatescompetition and creates innovative Internet uses at the margins of the network.Author:Professor of Law at Stanford University and founder of Stanford’s Centerfor Internet and Society.He received his BA and BS from the University ofPennsylvania, an MA from Cambridge University, and his JD from Yale University.He has clerked for Judge Richard Posner on the 7thCircuit Court of Appeals and forSupreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.*Testimony of Lawrence Lessig, C. Wendell and Edith M. Carl Smith Professor of Law,Stanford Law School, S. Comm. on Commerce, Science and Transportation Hearing on“Network Neutrality” February 7, 2006.

• 1495587935-christopher and wu.pdf

ComputerScienceExpert

(11)

Status NEW Posted 24 May 2017 01:05 AM My Price 9.00

-----------

Attachments

file 1495587936-Solutions file 2.docx preview (51 words )

H-----------ell-----------o S-----------ir/-----------Mad-----------am ----------- Th-----------ank----------- yo-----------u f-----------or -----------you-----------r i-----------nte-----------res-----------t a-----------nd -----------buy-----------ing----------- my----------- po-----------ste-----------d s-----------olu-----------tio-----------n. -----------Ple-----------ase----------- pi-----------ng -----------me -----------on -----------cha-----------t I----------- am----------- on-----------lin-----------e o-----------r i-----------nbo-----------x m-----------e a----------- me-----------ssa-----------ge -----------I w-----------ill----------- be----------- qu-----------ick-----------ly -----------onl-----------ine----------- an-----------d g-----------ive----------- yo-----------u e-----------xac-----------t f-----------ile----------- an-----------d t-----------he -----------sam-----------e f-----------ile----------- is----------- al-----------so -----------sen-----------t t-----------o y-----------our----------- em-----------ail----------- th-----------at -----------is -----------reg-----------ist-----------ere-----------d o-----------n -----------THI-----------S W-----------EBS-----------ITE-----------. ----------- Th-----------ank----------- yo-----------u -----------

Not Rated(0)

• Buy Answer