Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University
Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
Last Sign in: | 269 Weeks Ago, 2 Days Ago |
Questions Answered: | 6064 |
Tutorials Posted: | 6070 |
Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership with a Specialization in Educational Technology
Phoniex University
Oct-1999 - Nov-2005
HR Executive
a21, Inc.
Nov-1998 - Dec-2005
Read Davis v Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006) (attached). Briefly describe what the confrontation clause is and answer the following questions:
Under the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of the Sixth Amendment in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), may statements made to police during investigation of a crime - though not made with the intent to preserve evidence - be admitted in court without allowing defendants to cross-examine the person who made the original statements? How does the Court distinguish admissible statements from non-admissible statements?
Should be at least 500 words in length, be original in content, and demonstrate a thorough analysis of the topic. With one in text bluebook citation
Sol-----------uti-----------ons----------- fi-----------le ----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r y-----------our----------- in-----------ter-----------est----------- an-----------d b-----------uyi-----------ng -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I-----------