The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 359 Weeks Ago, 6 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 6064 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 6070 |
Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership with a Specialization in Educational Technology
Phoniex University
Oct-1999 - Nov-2005
HR Executive
a21, Inc.
Nov-1998 - Dec-2005
Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.
Due Week 8 and worth 240 points
Read the case titled: “Risk Management on a Satellite Development Project” found in Chapter 10.
Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills. Click here to access the rubric for this assignment.
|
Points: 240 |
Assignment 4: Risk Management on a Satellite Development Project |
|||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Suggest the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk plan. Determine the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for the project to be successful. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk plan. Did not submit or incompletely determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for the project to be successful. |
Partially suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk plan. Partially determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for the project to be successful. |
Satisfactorily suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk plan. Satisfactorily determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for the project to be successful. |
Thoroughly suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk plan. Thoroughly determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for the project to be successful. |
|
2. Justify the value of risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and resources it took to develop such a plan. If you were the project manager, recommend the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified. |
Did not submit or incompletely justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and resources it took to develop such a plan. Did not submit or incompletely recommended the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified, if you were the project manager. |
Partially justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and resources it took to develop such a plan. Partially recommended the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified, if you were the project manager. |
Satisfactorily justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and resources it took to develop such a plan. Satisfactorily recommended the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified, if you were the project manager. |
Thoroughly justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and resources it took to develop such a plan. Thoroughly recommended the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified, if you were the project manager. |
|
3. Assess how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a project. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a project. |
Partially assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a project. |
Satisfactorily assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a project. |
Thoroughly assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a project. |
|
4. Explain the expected impact on the project, and suggest two (2) ways the team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution. Weight: 30% |
Did not submit or incompletely explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two(2) ways the team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution. |
Partially explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two (2) ways the team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution. |
Satisfactorily explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two (2) ways the team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution. |
Thoroughly explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two (2) ways the team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution. |
|
5. Four (4) References Weight: 5% |
No references provided. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
6. Clarity and writing mechanics Weight: 10% |
More than 6 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
Sol-----------uti-----------ons----------- fi-----------le ----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r y-----------our----------- in-----------ter-----------est----------- an-----------d b-----------uyi-----------ng -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I-----------