The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 356 Weeks Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 20103 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 20155 |
MBA, PHD
Phoniex
Jul-2007 - Jun-2012
Corportae Manager
ChevronTexaco Corporation
Feb-2009 - Nov-2016
Question description
Â
Assignment 2: Price Analysis for the Navigation System
Worth 150 points
In order to complete this assignment, refer to the scenario from Assignment 1, as well as to the scenarios and readings from previous weeks.
Write a three (3) page paper in which you:
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 150 |
Assignment 2: Price Analysis for the Navigation System |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Analyze your company’s cost classification for pricing of the navigation system. Defend your cost classification to the U.S. government. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed your company’s cost classification for pricing of the navigation system. Did not submit or incompletely defended your cost classification to the U.S. government. |
Insufficiently analyzed your company’s cost classification for pricing of the navigation system. Insufficiently defended your cost classification to the U.S. government. |
Partially analyzed your company’s cost classification for pricing of the navigation system. Partially defended your cost classification to the U.S. government. |
Satisfactorily analyzed your company’s cost classification for pricing of the navigation system. Satisfactorily defended your cost classification to the U.S. government. |
Thoroughly analyzed your company’s cost classification for pricing of the navigation system. Thoroughly defended your cost classification to the U.S. government. |
|
2. Determine reasonable, allowable, allocable, variable, fixed, and semi-variable costs for your company after the initial start-up phase is complete. |
Did not submit or incompletely determined reasonable, allowable, allocable, variable, fixed, and semi-variable costs for your company after the initial start-up phase is complete. |
Insufficiently determined reasonable, allowable, allocable, variable, fixed, and semi-variable costs for your company after the initial start-up phase is complete. |
Partially determined reasonable, allowable, allocable, variable, fixed, and semi-variable costs for your company after the initial start-up phase is complete. |
Satisfactorily determined reasonable, allowable, allocable, variable, fixed, and semi-variable costs for your company after the initial start-up phase is complete. |
Thoroughly determined reasonable, allowable, allocable, variable, fixed, and semi-variable costs for your company after the initial start-up phase is complete. |
|
3. Predict the method for performing price analysis that the U.S. government will want from your new company and VectorCal. Justify the response. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely predicted the method for performing price analysis that the U.S. government will want from your new company and VectorCal. |
Insufficiently predicted the method for performing price analysis that the U.S. government will want from your new company and VectorCal. |
Partially predicted the method for performing price analysis that the U.S. government will want from your new company and VectorCal. |
Satisfactorily predicted the method for performing price analysis that the U.S. government will want from your new company and VectorCal. |
Thoroughly predicted the method for performing price analysis that the U.S. government will want from your new company and VectorCal. |
|
4. 3 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l