The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 353 Weeks Ago, 2 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 20103 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 20155 |
MBA, PHD
Phoniex
Jul-2007 - Jun-2012
Corportae Manager
ChevronTexaco Corporation
Feb-2009 - Nov-2016
Question description
Â
Â
Assignment 1: Proposal
Worth 150 points
Note:Â Refer to scenarios and readings from previous weeks in order to complete this assignment.
Imagine that you just created a new start-up company. You want to compete in the growing industry of drone navigation systems. VectorCal is the only major company in the field. You also want to be a leaner, faster version of a company that you view as being too slow and costly. Note: You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.
Write a three (3) page paper in which you:
1.  Describe the new start-up company that you have created. Include in your description the nature of your company, its mission and vision, your company’s product, an analysis of your staff, and your target clientele.
2.  Criticize VectorCal’s forecasting method. Determine the appropriate forecasting approach for your company. Provide a rationale to support the determination.
3.  Suggest the semi-variable, allocated, and indirect costs that you should address in the start-up phase of your company. Provide a rationale to support the response.
4.  Use at least four (4) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 150 |
Assignment 1: Proposal |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Describe the new start-up company that you have created. Include in your description the nature of your company, its mission and vision, your company’s product, an analysis of your staff, and your target clientele. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely described the new start-up company that you have created. Did not submit or incompletely included in your description the nature of your company, its mission and vision, your company’s product, an analysis of your staff, and your target clientele. |
Insufficiently described the new start-up company that you have created.  Insufficiently included in your description the nature of your company, its mission and vision, your company’s product, an analysis of your staff, and your target clientele. |
Partially described the new start-up company that you have created.  Partially included in your description the nature of your company, its mission and vision, your company’s product, an analysis of your staff, and your target clientele. |
Satisfactorily described the new start-up company that you have created.  Satisfactorily included in your description the nature of your company, its mission and vision, your company’s product, an analysis of your staff, and your target clientele. |
Thoroughly described the new start-up company that you have created.  Thoroughly included in your description the nature of your company, its mission and vision, your company’s product, an analysis of your staff, and your target clientele. |
|
2. Criticize VectorCal’s forecasting method. Determine the appropriate forecasting approach for your company. Provide a rationale to support the determination. |
Did not submit or incompletely criticized VectorCal’s forecasting method. Did not submit or incompletely determined the appropriate forecasting approach for your company; and did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support the determination. |
Insufficiently criticized VectorCal’s forecasting method.  Insufficiently determined the appropriate forecasting approach for your company. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support the determination. |
Partially criticized VectorCal’s forecasting method. Partially determined the appropriate forecasting approach for your company.  Partially provided a rationale to support the determination. |
Satisfactorily criticized VectorCal’s forecasting method.  Satisfactorily determined the appropriate forecasting approach for your company. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support the determination. |
Thoroughly criticized VectorCal’s forecasting method.  Thoroughly determined the appropriate forecasting approach for your company.  Thoroughly provided a rationale to support the determination. |
|
3. Suggest the semi-variable, allocated, and indirect costs that you should address in the start-up phase of your company. Provide a rationale to support the response. Weight: 35% |
Did not submit or incompletely suggest the semi-variable, allocated, and indirect costs that you should address in the start-up phase of your company. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support the response. |
Insufficiently suggested the semi-variable, allocated, and indirect costs that you should address in the start-up phase of your company. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support the response. |
Partially suggested the semi-variable, allocated, and indirect costs that you should address in the start-up phase of your company. Partially provided a rationale to support the response. |
Satisfactorily suggested the semi-variable, allocated, and indirect costs that you should address in the start-up phase of your company. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support the response. |
Thoroughly suggested the semi-variable, allocated, and indirect costs that you should address in the start-up phase of your company. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support the response. |
|
4. 3 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
Â
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l