The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | May 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 356 Weeks Ago, 3 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 20103 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 20155 |
MBA, PHD
Phoniex
Jul-2007 - Jun-2012
Corportae Manager
ChevronTexaco Corporation
Feb-2009 - Nov-2016
Question description
MUST BE ORIGINAL AND PASS TURNITIN.
Case Study 3: Risk Management on a Satellite Development Project
Read the attached case titled: “Risk Management on a Satellite Development Project”.
Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:
Your assignment must:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Case Study 3: Risk Management on a Satellite Development Project |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Suggest the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk plan. Determine the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for the project to be successful. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk plan. Did not submit or incompletely determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for the project to be successful. |
Partially suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk plan. Partially determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for the project to be successful. |
Satisfactorily suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk plan. Satisfactorily determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for the project to be successful. |
Thoroughly suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk plan. Thoroughly determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for the project to be successful. |
|
2. Justify the value of risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and resources it took to develop such a plan. If you were the project manager, recommend the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified. |
Did not submit or incompletely justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and resources it took to develop such a plan. Did not submit or incompletely recommended the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified, if you were the project manager. |
Partially justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and resources it took to develop such a plan. Partially recommended the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified, if you were the project manager. |
Satisfactorily justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and resources it took to develop such a plan. Satisfactorily recommended the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified, if you were the project manager. |
Thoroughly justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and resources it took to develop such a plan. Thoroughly recommended the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified, if you were the project manager. |
|
3. Assess how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a project. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a project. |
Partially assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a project. |
Satisfactorily assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a project. |
Thoroughly assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a project. |
|
4. Explain the expected impact on the project, and suggest two (2) ways the team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution. Weight: 30% |
Did not submit or incompletely explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two(2) ways the team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution. |
Partially explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two (2) ways the team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution. |
Satisfactorily explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two (2) ways the team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution. |
Thoroughly explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two (2) ways the team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution. |
|
5. Five (5) References Weight: 5% |
No references provided. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
6. Clarity and writing mechanics Weight: 10% |
More than 6 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
Hel-----------lo -----------Sir-----------/Ma-----------dam----------- T-----------han-----------k Y-----------ou -----------for----------- us-----------ing----------- ou-----------r w-----------ebs-----------ite----------- an-----------d a-----------cqu-----------isi-----------tio-----------n o-----------f m-----------y p-----------ost-----------ed -----------sol-----------uti-----------on.----------- Pl-----------eas-----------e p-----------ing----------- me----------- on----------- ch-----------at -----------I a-----------m o-----------nli-----------ne -----------or -----------inb-----------ox -----------me -----------a m-----------ess-----------age----------- I -----------wil-----------l