The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 328 Weeks Ago, 2 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 12843 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 12834 |
MBA, Ph.D in Management
Harvard university
Feb-1997 - Aug-2003
Professor
Strayer University
Jan-2007 - Present
John bought a new automobile. Shortly after
he purchased the vehicle, he was involved in
an accident and his airbag failed to deploy. As
a result John was seriously injured. John sued
the manufacturer for damages as a result of
the failure of the airbag to work. John can not
prove that the manufacturer was negligent in
any way. Therefore, the manufacturer states
that it is not liable to John and that John is not
entitled to prevail and recover damages from
the manufacturer. Does John have to prove that the
manufacturer was negligent in order to
prevail? If so, what elements must be proven?
If not, can John recover under another
theory? Explain thoroughly.
-----------