The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 327 Weeks Ago, 6 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 12843 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 12834 |
MBA, Ph.D in Management
Harvard university
Feb-1997 - Aug-2003
Professor
Strayer University
Jan-2007 - Present
Consider the argument,
In order to succeed a leader must have confidence in the abilities of her entire team. But having confidence is just believing in your own abilities. So in order to succeed a leader must be, on her own, the entire team.
Â
What might be best said of the flaw in the argument?
Â
It’s a fallacy of hasty explanation. Just because it’s true of some leaders doesn't mean it's true of all of them.
Â
The word ‘confidence’ is ambiguous. In one use it means ‘high degree of belief' and in another it means 'self-assurance.'
Â
The word ‘succeed’ is vague. It can mean ‘get rich’ and it can mean ‘meet your goals.’
Â
Some successful leaders work alone.
-----------