Miss Natalia

(14)

$20/per page/Negotiable

About Miss Natalia

Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University

Expertise:
Accounting,Business & Finance See all
Accounting,Business & Finance,Calculus,Computer Science,Environmental science,Health & Medical Hide all
Teaching Since: Apr 2017
Last Sign in: 368 Weeks Ago, 2 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 6064
Tutorials Posted: 6070

Education

  • Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership with a Specialization in Educational Technology
    Phoniex University
    Oct-1999 - Nov-2005

Experience

  • HR Executive
    a21, Inc.
    Nov-1998 - Dec-2005

Category > English Posted 08 Jun 2017 My Price 5.00

Evaluate whether the hypotheses follow logically from the arguments presented in the introduction.

1. Summarize the information contained in the abstract. 



2. Write down the major purpose of the study. 



3. Summarize the introduction (pay special attention to the topics presented, the

reference citations provided, and how reference citations are used). 



4. List the hypothesis of the study. 



5. Evaluate whether the hypotheses follow logically from the arguments presented in the introduction. 



6. Briefly summarize the information contained in each of the subsections included under

the method section. 



7. Evaluate whether there is sufficient information in each section to allow the study to be replicated. What is missing? 



8. If your article is an experiment, list the variables manipulated by the researchers and the behaviors measured. If a correlational study is described, list the variables measured.



9. Evaluate the adequacy of the measures for testing the hypothesis (this may be difficult, but take a shot at it). 



10. List the major findings of the study as reported in the results. 



11. Show how statistics were used to determine the significance of the findings (what statistics were reported and how they were used). 



12. Summarize and evaluate the information in the discussion. Did the author's conclusions follow logically from the results reported (why or why not)? Were there alternative explanations offered for the results? 



13. In conclusion, did the study adequately evaluate the hypothesis stated in the introduction? Why or why not?

 

 

This is the article

 Care, P. (2009). Discussing palliative care with patients. Ann Intern Med, 130, 744-749.(FULL TEXT)

 

Answers

Miss Natalia
(14)
Status NEW Posted 08 Jun 2017 06:06 AM My Price 5.00

Sol-----------uti-----------ons----------- fi-----------le ----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r y-----------our----------- in-----------ter-----------est----------- an-----------d b-----------uyi-----------ng -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I-----------

Not Rated(0)