Miss Natalia

(14)

$20/per page/Negotiable

About Miss Natalia

Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University

Expertise:
Accounting,Business & Finance See all
Accounting,Business & Finance,Calculus,Computer Science,Environmental science,Health & Medical Hide all
Teaching Since: Apr 2017
Last Sign in: 359 Weeks Ago, 6 Days Ago
Questions Answered: 6064
Tutorials Posted: 6070

Education

  • Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership with a Specialization in Educational Technology
    Phoniex University
    Oct-1999 - Nov-2005

Experience

  • HR Executive
    a21, Inc.
    Nov-1998 - Dec-2005

Category > Math Posted 20 Jun 2017 My Price 10.00

Can the proof be performed more efficiently by using different equivalence rules?

Below are basic arguments in English. Choose one argument and translate the argument into the symbolism of predicate logic. Use one of the proof techniques from Chapter 8 to demonstrate the validity of the argument.

  1. Every fetus has an immortal soul. A thing has an immortal soul only if it has a right to life. Hence, every fetus has a right to life. (Fx = x is a fetus, Sx = x has an immortal soul, Rx = x has a right to life).
  2. Some wars are just. No war of aggression is just. Therefore, there are wars that are not wars of aggression. (Wx = x is a war, Jx = x is just, Ax = x is a war of aggression).
  3. At least one instance of intentional killing is not wrong. But every murder is wrong. Hence, some instances of intentional killing are not murder. (Kx = x is an instance of intentional killing, Wx = x is wrong, Mx = x is murder)
  4. Only things that have human bodies are human. No soul has a human body. Only souls survive the death of the body. Therefore, no humans survive the death of the body. (Bx = x has a human body, Hx = x is human, Sx = x is a soul, Dx = x survives the death of the body)

In your peer responses, make suggestions for an alternate proof. Consider the following questions when constructing your response:

  • If the proof was done using RAA, could it be done using CP? What about vice versa?
  • Will a direct proof work for any of these?
  • Can the proof be performed more efficiently by using different equivalence rules?
 

Answers

(14)
Status NEW Posted 20 Jun 2017 08:06 AM My Price 10.00

Sol-----------uti-----------ons----------- fi-----------le ----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r y-----------our----------- in-----------ter-----------est----------- an-----------d b-----------uyi-----------ng -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I-----------

Not Rated(0)