The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,Middle School,High School,College,University,PHD
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 327 Weeks Ago, 5 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 12843 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 12834 |
MBA, Ph.D in Management
Harvard university
Feb-1997 - Aug-2003
Professor
Strayer University
Jan-2007 - Present
I need help with the following:
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In the M2A1 Final Project Milestone One: Trade Agreement Impacts, you conducted initial research on a developed and developing country's trade agreements. You were provided substantive feedback from your instructor. The feedback falls into two general categories, content and formatting. For this assignment, we will focus on the content-related feedback.
PROMPT
Review the instructor feedback from Final Project Milestone One: Trade Agreement Impacts and respond to the instructor comments.
Tasks:
Your paper should be 2-3 pages long with a minimum of 2 references in a double-spaced document using 12 pt. Times New Roman font, utilizing APA format.
EVALUATION
See associated rubric.
This is the rubric.
Name:Â M2A1 Milestone One RubricTrade Agreement Selection24 (24%)
Levels of Achievement:Level 1 Descriptor
0 (0%) points
The top three trade agreements for each country that have the greatest impact are identified but hardly described, if at all.
Level 2 Descriptor
18 (18%) points
The top three trade agreements for each country that have the greatest impact are identified, and information about each country's pending and existing trade agreements are briefly described, with important details vague or missing.
Level 3 Descriptor
24 (24%) points
The top three trade agreements for each country that have the greatest impact are generally described. Information provided is relevant and important in building the foundation on which the Market Entry Analysis Proposal will be built, though more details are needed to fill in important gaps about each country's pending and existing trade agreements.
Level 4 Descriptor
30 (30%) points
The top three trade agreements for each country that have the greatest impact are described in detail, including each country's pending and existing trade agreements. Information provided is relevant and important in building the foundation on which the Market Entry Analysis Proposal will be built.
Feedback:
Analysis and Justification of Trade Agreements38 (38%)
Levels of Achievement:Level 1 Descriptor
0 (0%) points
Analysis of the potential impacts that the three trade agreements selected will have on the chosen countries, and the explanation of why learner did not select other trade agreements is barely presented, if at all.
Level 2 Descriptor
27 (27%) points
Analysis of the potential impacts that the three trade agreements selected will have on the chosen countries and the explanation of why learner did not select other trade agreements is brief, and reflects major misconceptions and/or incomplete understanding.
Level 3 Descriptor
38 (38%) points
Analysis of the potential impacts that the three trade agreements selected will have on the chosen countries is accurate, including general discussion on why learner did not select other trade agreements. Justifications of the analysis are accurate and appropriate, identifying sections as evidence and discussing them, with some important details missing.
Level 4 Descriptor
45 (45%) points
Analysis of the potential impacts that the three trade agreements selected will have on the chosen countries is thorough and accurate, including detailed discussion on why learner did not select other trade agreements. Justifications of the analysis are thorough and accurate, identifying clearly specific sections as evidence and discussing them with detail.
Feedback:
Use of Sources as Evidence6 (6%)
Levels of Achievement:Level 1 Descriptor
0 (0%) points
The resources, if any, are not credible.
Level 2 Descriptor
6 (6%) points
Resources are noted in the reference list but are not relevant to the topic at hand. They may be used as sources of evidence to support claims, but are used forcibly, and not appropriately. Including additional sources or information about the sources may have strengthened the support of why the three trade agreements selected would have the greatest impact.
Level 3 Descriptor
12 (12%) points
The resources noted in the reference list are credible and have relevance to the topic at hand, and are used as sources of evidence to support claims made. Some of these connections, however, may be a little far-fetched. Including additional sources or information about sources may have strengthened the support of why the three trade agreements selected would have the greatest impact.
Level 4 Descriptor
15 (15%) points
The resources noted in the reference list are credible, and have clear relevance to the topic at hand, and are used as sources of evidence to support claims made. A sufficient number of sources were used to make strong arguments for why the three trade agreements selected would have the greatest impact.
Feedback:
Writing Quality/APA Style8 (8%)
Levels of Achievement:Level 1 Descriptor
0 (0%) points
Frequent problems with organization, clarity and/or conventions make the paper hard to read. APA style guidelines are not adhered to. Possible plagiarism risks the appearance of cheating.
Level 2 Descriptor
6 (6%) points
Numerous mechanical errors are distracting, and organization of ideas are lacking, but not enough to interfere with meaning. APA style guidelines are attempted, with major errors.
Level 3 Descriptor
8 (8%) points
There are few problems with organization, clarity or conventions that should have been fixed. APA style guidelines are followed, with only minor errors; however, these problems and errors are not serious enough to distract the reader.
Level 4 Descriptor
10 (10%) points
The writing is well organized and clear; there are minimal problems with spelling, punctuation, and grammar; APA style guidelines are followed accurately.
Feedback:
Raw Total: 76.00 (of 100.0)
Â
This assignment is only a revision.
Attachments:
-----------