The world’s Largest Sharp Brain Virtual Experts Marketplace Just a click Away
Levels Tought:
Elementary,High School,College,University
| Teaching Since: | Apr 2017 |
| Last Sign in: | 360 Weeks Ago, 3 Days Ago |
| Questions Answered: | 6064 |
| Tutorials Posted: | 6070 |
Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership with a Specialization in Educational Technology
Phoniex University
Oct-1999 - Nov-2005
HR Executive
a21, Inc.
Nov-1998 - Dec-2005
Assignment 1: Required Assignment 2—Tracking Progress on Sustainability Goals
Good intentions must be followed by actions leading to measurable outcomes. Sustainability initiatives and their outcomes are tracked through accountability systems and transparent reporting.
Click here to download and review the Top Shelf scenario so far
Use your module readings, the Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet to research accountability systems and transparent reporting.
Use your research to first analyze how the factors apply to Walmart’s sustainability index and then to create a transparent sustainability report for Top Shelf. Write a report that includes the following:
Write a report that includes the following:
Write a 10–12-page report in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M5_A1.doc.
By Wednesday, July 5, 2017, deliver your assignment to the M5: Assignment 2 Dropbox.
| Assignment 1 Grading Criteria |
Maximum Points
|
| Explained the innovation in Walmart’s sustainability index demonstrating research and analysis of sustainability considerations. |
40
|
| Explained whether Walmart’s approach can be used by Top Shelf to track their efforts demonstrating in-depth analysis. |
40
|
| Evaluated two other approaches (different from that of Walmart) that could be used by Top Shelf to track their efforts. |
56
|
| Recommended one approach for Top Shelf and explained in detail how the company can measure, track, and report progress on their sustainability goals. |
56
|
| Explained why your recommendation would be superior to the status quo giving reasons based on peer-reviewed literature. |
44
|
| Assertions demonstrated in-depth research and analysis of information. |
40
|
| Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. |
24
|
| Total: |
300
|
Sol-----------uti-----------ons----------- fi-----------le ----------- He-----------llo----------- Si-----------r/M-----------ada-----------m -----------Tha-----------nk -----------you----------- fo-----------r y-----------our----------- in-----------ter-----------est----------- an-----------d b-----------uyi-----------ng -----------my -----------pos-----------ted----------- so-----------lut-----------ion-----------. P-----------lea-----------se -----------pin-----------g m-----------e o-----------n c-----------hat----------- I -----------am -----------onl-----------ine----------- or----------- in-----------box----------- me----------- a -----------mes-----------sag-----------e I-----------